...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Cardiologica >Prospective randomized trial of transthoracic versus low-energy transvenous internal cardioversion in persistent atrial fibrillation.
【24h】

Prospective randomized trial of transthoracic versus low-energy transvenous internal cardioversion in persistent atrial fibrillation.

机译:经胸与低能量静脉内心脏复律治疗持续性心房颤动的前瞻性随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Electrical cardioversion (CV) is used to restore sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). In this prospective randomized study, we compared two different methods of electrical CV, namely transthoracic (TT) and low-energy transvenous internal CV (ICV), in patients with persistent AF with respect to efficacy, safety and the magnitude of myocardial damage provoked by either method. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with persistent AF were randomly assigned to either TT (n = 26) or ICV (n = 26). The baseline characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. TT CV was performed under sedation with hand-held electrodes in the apex-anterior position and high-energy (100-360J) monophasic shocks. ICV was performed by a single catheter approach utilizing a special balloon-directed catheter with proximal and distal arrays of shock electrodes that were positioned in the right atrium and left pulmonary artery under fluoroscopy. Truncated, biphasic shocks of low energy (1-15 joules) were used. Cardiac troponin T (cTpnT), creatine kinase (CK) and CK-MB levels were assessed before and 24 hours after each procedure. SR was restored in 24/26 (92%) patients in the ICV and 22/26 (85%) patients in the TT CV groups (p > 0.05). The mean energy to achieve SR was significantly higher with the TT method (9.8 +/- 4.3 J vs. 246.4 +/- 73.6 J, p < 0.05). CV with either method caused no elevation in cTpnT levels. Total CK and CK-MB levels remained unchanged with ICV. On the other hand, TT CV resulted in a significant increase in total CK (51.8 +/- 30 vs. 156.5 +/- 255.3, p < 0.05) and a nonsignificant rise in CK-MB levels (14.7 +/- 7 vs. 17.3 +/- 1.1, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective randomized comparison, TT and ICV were found to be equally effective to restore SR in patients with persistent AF No evidence of myocardial damage was detected with either method.
机译:目的:电复律(CV)用于恢复房颤(AF)患者的窦性心律(SR)。在这项前瞻性随机研究中,我们比较了持续性房颤患者的两种不同的电动CV方法,即经胸(TT)和低能量静脉内CV(ICV),其有效性,安全性和由心肌梗死引起的心肌损害的程度任一种方法。方法和结果:52例持续性房颤患者被随机分配至TT(n = 26)或ICV(n = 26)。两个治疗组的基线特征相似。 TT CV在镇静状态下进行,手持式电极在先端位置和高能量(100-360J)单相电击下进行。 ICV是通过单导管方法进行的,该方法使用特殊的气球导向导管,并在荧光检查下将冲击电极的近端和远端阵列放置在右心房和左肺动脉中。使用低能量的截断双相电击(1-15焦耳)。在每次手术之前和之后24小时评估心肌肌钙蛋白T(cTpnT),肌酸激酶(CK)和CK-MB水平。 ICV组的24/26(92%)患者和TT CV组的22/26(85%)患者的SR恢复(p> 0.05)。用TT方法测得的SR的平均能量明显更高(9.8 +/- 4.3 J与246.4 +/- 73.6 J,p <0.05)。任一种方法的CV均不会导致cTpnT水平升高。 ICV的总CK和CK-MB水平保持不变。另一方面,TT CV导致总CK显着增加(51.8 +/- 30与156.5 +/- 255.3,p <0.05),并且CK-MB水平无显着增加(14.7 +/- 7vs。 17.3 +/- 1.1,p> 0.05)。结论:在这项前瞻性随机比较中,发现TT和ICV对持续性房颤患者恢复SR同样有效,两种方法均未检测到心肌损伤的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号