首页> 外文期刊>Cutis >Comparison of Pneumatic Broadband Light Plus Adapalene Gel 0.3% Versus Adapalene Gel 0.3% Monotherapy in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Acne
【24h】

Comparison of Pneumatic Broadband Light Plus Adapalene Gel 0.3% Versus Adapalene Gel 0.3% Monotherapy in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Acne

机译:气动宽带光加阿达帕林凝胶0.3%与阿达帕林凝胶0.3%单药治疗轻度至中度痤疮的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Acne vulgaris is a common and distressing condition that typically presents in adolescents and young adults. The aim of this split-face, single-blind, randomized, controlled study was to determine if combination therapy with pneumatic broadband light (PBBL) plus adapalene gel 0.3% is superior to adapalene gel 0.3% monotherapy in the treatment of acne. Results indicated that the addition of PBBL to topical regimens may lead to quicker results and therefore may improve treatment adherence to topical therapies in acne patients.
机译:寻常痤疮是一种常见的困扰性疾病,通常出现在青少年和年轻人中。这项单面,单盲,随机,对照研究的目的是确定在治疗痤疮中,使用气动宽带光(PBBL)加0.3%的阿达帕林凝胶的联合治疗是否优于0.3%的阿达帕林凝胶单独治疗。结果表明,在局部用药方案中添加PBBL可能会导致更快的结果,因此可以改善痤疮患者对局部疗法的治疗依从性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号