...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic pediatrics >Parent-reported quality of preventive care for children at-risk for developmental delay
【24h】

Parent-reported quality of preventive care for children at-risk for developmental delay

机译:家长报告的发育迟缓风险儿童的预防保健质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: To compare preventive care quality for children at risk and not at risk for developmental, behavioral, or social delays. Methods: Using the 2007 National Survey of Children's Health (n = 22,269), we used the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) questionnaire to identify children ages 10 months to 5 years who were at risk for delays. We examined parent-reported quality measures to evaluate whether care was comprehensive, coordinated, family-centered, effective in providing developmental surveillance and screening, and provided within a medical home. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used. Results: Twenty-eight percent of children were at-risk for delay, with 17% at moderate risk and 11% at high risk. Greater proportions of children at high, moderate, and no/low risk had a usual source of care (89%-96%) and a personal doctorurse (91%-94%); smaller proportions of children underwent a standardized developmental screening (16%-23%) and had parental developmental concerns elicited from their doctor (47%-48%). In adjusted analyses, moderate-risk and high-risk children were less likely than no/low-risk children to receive needed care coordination (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] for high risk 0.33, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.24-0.46) and referrals (high risk AOR 0.40, 95% CI 0.25-0.65), family-centered care (high-risk AOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.36-0.62), and to have a medical home (high-risk AOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.32-0.54). Conclusions: Our findings may reflect either poorer quality of care provided to at-risk children, or higher level of parental need that routine visits are not currently meeting. For at-risk children, enhanced screening and detection followed by targeted increases in communication and follow-up may help clinicians better anticipate families' needs.
机译:目的:比较有风险和没有发育,行为或社会延迟风险的儿童的预防保健质量。方法:我们使用《 2007年全国儿童健康调查》(n = 22,269),使用了《父母对发育状况的评估》(PEDS)问卷来识别10个月至5岁的有延误风险的儿童。我们检查了父母报告的质量衡量指标,以评估护理是否全面,协调,以家庭为中心,是否有效提供发育监测和筛查以及是否在医疗室内提供。使用双变量和多变量分析。结果:28%的儿童有延迟风险,其中17%为中度风险,11%为高风险。高,中,无/低风险的儿童中,有较大比例的儿童有通常的护理来源(89%-96%)和私人医生/护士(91%-94%);较小比例的儿童接受了标准化的发育筛查(16%-23%),并从医生那里引起了父母对发育的担忧(47%-48%)。在调整后的分析中,中度和高危儿童比没有/低风险的儿童接受必要的护理协调的可能性较小(高风险的调整比值比[AOR] 0.33,95%的置信区间[95%CI] 0.24 0.46)和转诊(高风险AOR 0.40,95%CI 0.25-0.65),以家庭为中心的护理(高风险AOR 0.47,95%CI 0.36-0.62),以及拥有医疗之家(高风险AOR 0.41, 95%CI 0.32-0.54)。结论:我们的发现可能反映了为处于危险中的儿童提供的护理质量较差,或者父母对父母的需求水平较高,而常规探访目前尚不能满足。对于高危儿童,加强筛查和检测,然后有针对性地增加交流和随访,可以帮助临床医生更好地预测家庭的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号