首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >Organizational culture in an academic health center: An exploratory study using a competing values framework
【24h】

Organizational culture in an academic health center: An exploratory study using a competing values framework

机译:学术卫生中心的组织文化:使用竞争性价值观框架进行的探索性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: Implementing cultural change and aligning organizational cultures could enhance innovation, quality, safety, and job satisfaction. The authors conducted this mixed-methods study to assess academic physician-scientists' perceptions of the current and preferred future organizational culture at a university medical school and its partner health system. Method: In October 2010, the authors surveyed academic physicians and scientists jointly employed by the University of Oxford and its local, major partner health system. The survey included the U.S. Veterans Affairs Administration's 14-item Competing Values Framework instrument and two extra items prompting respondents to identify their substantive employer and to provide any additional open-ended comments. Results: Of 436 academic physicians and scientists, 170 (39%) responded. Of these, 69 (41%) provided open-ended comments. Dominant hierarchical culture, moderate rational and team cultures, and underdeveloped entrepreneurial culture characterized the health system culture profile. The university profile was more balanced, with strong rational and entrepreneurial cultures, and moderate-to-strong hierarchical and team cultures. The preferred future culture (within five years) would emphasize team and entrepreneurial cultures and-to a lesser degree-rational culture, and would deemphasize hierarchical culture. Conclusions: Whereas the university and the health system currently have distinct organizational cultures, academic physicians and scientists would prefer the same type of culture across the two organizations so that both could more successfully pursue the shared mission of academic medicine. Further research should explore strengthening the validity and reliability of the organizational culture instrument for academic medicine and building an evidence base of effective culture change strategies and interventions.
机译:目的:实施文化变革和调整组织文化可以增强创新,质量,安全性和工作满意度。作者进行了这项混合方法研究,以评估学术医师-科学家对大学医学院及其合作伙伴健康系统当前和首选的未来组织文化的看法。方法:2010年10月,作者对牛津大学及其当地主要合作伙伴卫生系统联合聘用的学术医师和科学家进行了调查。该调查包括美国退伍军人事务管理局(U.S. Veterans Affairs Administration)的14项竞争价值框架工具,以及另外两个项目,促使受访者确定其实质性雇主并提供任何其他开放性意见。结果:在436位学术医生和科学家中,有170位(39%)回答。其中69(41%)人提供开放性评论。主导的等级文化,适度的理性和团队文化以及不发达的企业家文化是卫生系统文化特征的特征。大学的形象更加平衡,具有浓厚的理性和企业家文化以及中度到强度的等级制度和团队文化。首选的未来文化(五年内)将强调团队和企业家文化,以及在较低程度上具有理性的文化,并且将不再强调等级文化。结论:尽管大学和卫生系统当前具有不同的组织文化,但学术医师和科学家在两个组织中更喜欢相同类型的文化,以便双方都可以更成功地追求学术医学的共同使命。进一步的研究应探索加强用于学术医学的组织文化工具的有效性和可靠性,并为有效的文化变革策略和干预措施建立证据基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号