首页> 外文期刊>Accreditation and quality assurance >International comparability of determination of mass fractions of chromium, copper, iron, manganese and zinc in aluminium alloy: Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière key comparison K42
【24h】

International comparability of determination of mass fractions of chromium, copper, iron, manganese and zinc in aluminium alloy: Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière key comparison K42

机译:测定铝合金中铬,铜,铁,锰和锌的质量分数的国际可比性:数量委员会主要比较K42

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The degree of equivalence within the participating national metrology institutes for the measurement results of the mass fractions of the analytes Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn in an aluminium alloy was assessed. This interlaboratory comité consultatif pour la quantité de matière key comparison (CCQM-K42) was organised as an activity of the Inorganic Analytical Working Group of CCQM. In total seven laboratories participated, six of them for all analytes. Measurands were the mass fractions of the analytes in a range of 0.05 and 0.2%. As an outcome the consistency of the results for all elements investigated was acceptable, hence satisfactory comparability was established. An aluminium based certified reference material-undisclosed to the analysts which one it was-was used as test sample. For the purpose of this study homogeneity was tested at BAM. Each laboratory was free to choose any analytical method they wanted to use for the analysis. Consequently various methods of measurement were employed: instrumental neutron activation analysis, X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) using fused cast-bead method combined with reconstitution technique, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Metrological traceability of the measurement results to the SI unit had to be demonstrated. Therefore, methods such as spark OES or XRF (without fused cast-bead technique)-both of them being most important methods for the analysis of metals and alloys in industrial laboratories-could not be used in the frame of the key comparison.
机译:评估了参与的国家计量机构中铝合金中分析物Cr,Cu,Fe,Mn和Zn的质量分数测量结果的等效程度。此实验室间委员会的定量研究关键比较(CCQM-K42)是CCQM无机分析工作组的一项活动。共有七个实验室参与其中,其中六个实验室用于所有分析物。被测物是分析物的质量分数,范围为0.05至0.2%。结果,所有被调查元素的结果一致性是可以接受的,因此建立了令人满意的可比性。铝基认证参考材料(未公开给分析人员使用)被用作测试样品。为了本研究的目的,在BAM测试了同质性。每个实验室可以自由选择要用于分析的任何分析方法。因此,采用了各种测量方法:仪器中子活化分析,使用熔融铸珠法结合重构技术的X射线荧光光谱法(XRF),电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法(ICP OES)和电感耦合等离子体质谱法。必须证明测量结果在计量单位上的计量溯源性。因此,诸如火花OES或XRF(无熔铸珠技术)之类的方法(它们都是工业实验室中分析金属和合金的最重要方法)不能在关键比较的框架中使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号