首页> 外文期刊>Chronobiology international >Clock gene expression in human and mouse hepatic models shows similar periodicity but different dynamics of variation
【24h】

Clock gene expression in human and mouse hepatic models shows similar periodicity but different dynamics of variation

机译:人和小鼠肝模型中Clock基因的表达显示相似的周期性,但变异动态不同

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The biological hard-wiring of 24-hour rhythmicity relies on the circadian clock circuitry, made of peripheral oscillators operated by molecular clockworks and synchronized through humoral and neural outputs by central oscillators located in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei. Metabolically active tissues, such as the liver, are entrained also by local cues represented by metabolic flux related to feeding. The mechanics of the molecular clockwork have been explored by studies using cell lines and wild type or genetically engineered mouse models. There is a compelling need to reduce the use of animals in experimental settings. The aim of our study was to evaluate the periodicity and dynamics of functioning of the hepatic clock gene machinery in human and mouse hepatic models. We compared the results obtained in human hepatoma cells (HepG2 cells) and in mouse liver, and a significant 24-hour rhythmic component was found for five clock genes in the HepG2 cells (Bmal1, Cry1, Per1, Per2, NR1D1) and for six clock genes in the mouse liver (Bmal1, Clock, Cry1, Per1, Per2, NR1D1). The amplitude of oscillation rendered by the cosine curve and the dynamics of expression rendered by the rate of change (the derivative of gene expression level with respect to time) were greater in the mouse liver than in the HepG2 cells for Bmal1, Per1, Per2 and NR1D1, and the cosine curve phase was different for many of them. In conclusion, the periodicity of expression of the clock genes showed similar patterns when the two experimental models were compared, whereas the dynamics of transcription in human hepatoma cells cultured in vitro were less vigorous and phased in a different way when compared to mouse hepatic tissue. The results support the reliability of the human hepatic in vitro model as an alternative to animal models only to study the periodicity of function of the molecular clockwork, but not to evaluate the dynamics of clock gene expression.
机译:24小时节律性的生物硬接线依赖于生物钟时钟电路,该电路由分子钟表操作的外围振荡器组成,并由位于下丘脑上视交叉上核的中央振荡器通过体液和神经输出而同步。代谢活性组织(例如肝脏)也被与进食相关的代谢通量所代表的局部提示所夹带。分子发条的机制已通过使用细胞系和野生型或基因工程小鼠模型的研究进行了探索。迫切需要减少在实验环境中使用动物。我们研究的目的是评估人类和小鼠肝模型中肝时钟基因机制功能的周期性和动态。我们比较了在人类肝癌细胞(HepG2细胞)和小鼠肝脏中获得的结果,发现在HepG2细胞中的五个时钟基因(Bmal1,Cry1,Per1,Per2,NR1D1)和六个重要的24小时节律成分小鼠肝脏中的时钟基因(Bmal1,Clock,Cry1,Per1,Per2,NR1D1)。对于Bmal1,Per1,Per2和Perl,小鼠肝脏中,余弦曲线产生的振荡幅度和变化率(基因表达水平相对于时间的导数)产生的表达动态大于HepG2细胞。 NR1D1和余弦曲线相位对于其中许多而言是不同的。总而言之,当比较两个实验模型时,时钟基因的表达周期显示出相似的模式,而与小鼠肝组织相比,体外培养的人肝癌细胞中转录的活力较弱,并且以不同的方式分阶段进行。结果支持人肝体外模型作为动物模型的替代品的可靠性,仅用于研究分子发条的功能周期性,而不能评估时钟基因表达的动力学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号