首页> 外文期刊>Chronobiology international >Chronotype, sleep loss, and diurnal pattern of salivary cortisol in a simulated daylong driving
【24h】

Chronotype, sleep loss, and diurnal pattern of salivary cortisol in a simulated daylong driving

机译:在模拟的全天驾驶中唾液皮质醇的时间型,睡眠丧失和昼夜模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The study focused on chronotype-related differences in subjective load assessment, sleepiness, and salivary cortisol pattern in subjects performing daylong simulated driving. Individual differences in work stress appraisal and psychobiological cost of prolonged load seem to be of importance in view of expanding compressed working time schedules. Twenty-one healthy, male volunteers (mean±SD: 27.9±4.9 yrs) were required to stay in semiconstant routine conditions. They performed four sessions (each lasting ~2.5h) of simulated driving, i.e., completed chosen tasks from computer driving games. Saliva samples were collected after each driving session, i.e., at 10:0011:00, 14:0015:00, 18:0019:00, and 22:0023:00h as well as 1030min after waking (between 05:00 and 06:00h) and at bedtime (after 00:00h). Two subgroups of subjects were distinguished on the basis of the Chronotype Questionnaire: morning (M)- and evening (E)-oriented types. Subjective data on sleep need, sleeping time preferences, sleeping problems, and the details of the preceding night were investigated by questionnaire. Subjective measures of task load (NASA Task Load Index [NASA-TLX]), activation (Thayer's Activation-Deactivation Adjective Check List [AD ACL]), and sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale [KSS]) were applied at times of saliva samples collection. M- and E-oriented types differed significantly as to their ideal sleep length (6 h 54 min±44 versus 8 h 13 min±50 min), preferred sleep timing (midpoint at 03:19 versus 04:26), and sleep index, i.e., 'real-to-ideal' sleep ratio, before the experimental day (0.88 versus 0.67). Sleep deficit proved to be integrated with eveningness. M and E types exhibited similar diurnal profiles of energy, tiredness, tension, and calmness assessed by AD ACL, but E types estimated higher their workload (NASA-TLX) and sleepiness (KSS). M types exhibited a trend of higher mean cortisol levels than E types (F4.192, p<.056) and distinct diurnal variation (F2.950, p<.019), whereas E types showed a flattened diurnal curve. Cortisol values did not correlate with subjective assessments of workload, arousal, or sleepiness at any time-of-day. Diurnal cortisol pattern parameters (i.e., morning level, mean level, and range of diurnal changes) showed significant positive correlations with sleep length before the experiment (r.48, .54, and .53, respectively) and with sleep index (r.63, .64, and .56, respectively). The conclusions of this study are: (i) E-oriented types showed lower salivary cortisol levels and a flattened diurnal curve in comparison with M types; (ii) sleep loss was associated with lower morning cortisol and mean diurnal level, whereas higher cortisol levels were observed in rested individuals. In the context of stress theory, it may be hypothesized that rested subjects perceived the driving task as a challenge, whereas those with reduced sleep were not challenged, but boredexhausted with the experimental situation.
机译:这项研究的重点是在进行全天模拟驾驶的受试者中,主观负荷评估,嗜睡和唾液皮质醇模式中与表型相关的差异。考虑到压缩工作时间表的延长,工作压力评估的个人差异和长期负荷的心理生物学成本似乎很重要。需要二十一名健康的男性志愿者(平均±SD:27.9±4.9岁)保持在半恒定的常规条件下。他们进行了四节模拟驾驶(每次持续约2.5小时),即完成了计算机驾驶游戏中的选定任务。每次开车后,即在10:0011:00、14:0015:00、18:0019:00和22:0023:00h以及醒来后1030分钟(05:00至06: 00h)和就寝时间(00:00h之后)。根据时间型问卷将受试者分为两个亚组:面向上午(M)和傍晚(E)的类型。通过调查问卷调查有关睡眠需求,睡眠时间偏好,睡眠问题和前一天晚上的细节的主观数据。在收集唾液样本时,采用任务负荷(NASA任务负荷指数[NASA-TLX]),激活(Thayer的激活-停用形容词检查表[AD ACL])和嗜睡(Karolinska嗜睡量表[KSS])的主观测量方法。 M方向和E方向的类型在理想的睡眠时间(6小时54分钟±44分钟与8小时13分钟±50分钟),首选睡眠时间(03:19与04:26的中点)之间存在显着差异,即实验日之前的“理想睡眠”比率(0.88对0.67)。睡眠不足被证明与晚上有关。 M型和E型通过AD ACL表现出相似的昼夜能量,疲劳,紧张和平静感,但E型估计其工作量(NASA-TLX)和嗜睡(KSS)更高。 M型表现出比E型(F4.192,p <.056)平均皮质醇水平更高的趋势,并且昼夜变化明显(F2.950,p <.019),而E型则显示出平坦的昼夜曲线。皮质醇值与一天中任何时间的工作量,唤醒或困倦的主观评估均不相关。昼夜皮质醇模式参数(即早晨水平,平均水平和昼夜变化范围)与实验前的睡眠时间(分别为r.48,.54和.53)和睡眠指数(r.4)呈显着正相关。分别为63,.64和.56)。这项研究的结论是:(i)与M型相比,E型的唾液皮质醇水平较低,昼夜曲线平坦; (ii)睡眠不足与早晨皮质醇水平和平均昼夜水平相关,而在休息的个体中皮质醇水平较高。在压力理论的背景下,可以假设休息的受试者将驾驶任务视为挑战,而睡眠不足的受试者则没有受到挑战,但实验条件使他们精疲力尽。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号