...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular surgery >Prospective, randomized study of long-term hemodialysis catheter removal versus guidewire exchange to treat catheter-related bloodstream infection
【24h】

Prospective, randomized study of long-term hemodialysis catheter removal versus guidewire exchange to treat catheter-related bloodstream infection

机译:前瞻性,随机研究长期血液透析导管去除与导管交换处理导管相关的血流感染

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Long-term (tunneled cuffed) hemodialysis catheters are frequently used vascular access in renal failure patients. Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is a common complication of long-term hemodialysis catheters, with severe morbidities and high risk of mortality. Management of CRBSI by systemic antibiotics while keeping the catheter in place is not effective. Among the different modalities of CRBSI management are catheter removal (CR) and guidewire exchange (GE) of the catheter. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of CRBSI treated with two different strategies: GE vs CR with new catheter insertion 3 to 7 days later.
机译:背景:长期(隧道式袖扣)血液透析导管经常使用肾功能衰竭患者的血管进入。 与导管相关的血流感染(CRBSI)是长期血液透析导管的常见并发症,具有严重的病理和高等程度的死亡率。 通过全身抗生素管理CRBSI,同时保持导管到位的同时无效。 在CRBSI管理的不同模式中,导管的导管移除(CR)和导管的导丝交换(GE)。 本研究的目的是比较用两种不同的策略治疗的CRBSI的临床结果:GE与新导管插入3至7天后的GE与CR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号