首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry >Application of different thermal analysis techniques for the evaluation of petroleum source rocks
【24h】

Application of different thermal analysis techniques for the evaluation of petroleum source rocks

机译:不同热分析技术在石油源岩评价中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the paper, various laboratory pyrolytic methods were used to evaluate selected petroleum source rocks. The methods used are: Rock-Eval pyrolysis, Py-GC pyrolytic technique and TG/DTG/DSC. The experiments of the last method were performed according to three different procedures. Each of them provided different, specific data. The selected rock sample material was diversified in terms of stratigraphical position, structural unit and place of collection (outcrop or borehole). Based on the Rock-Eval analysis results, kerogen in samples can be classified as type II. Additional information on the quality of pyrolysis products was obtained from the Py-GC analysis. Thanks to the combination of the all three implemented pyrolytic techniques, the quality of the generation potential of the source rocks can be evaluated in details. In some samples, the oxidation and pyrolysis of organic matter occur in two stages, what is the evidence of the complex nature of the organic substance. The maximum of pyrolysis reaction is detected by TG/DTG measurement in the range of temperature from 450 to 580 degrees C, depending on the maturity of organic matter. The maturity level increases with the rock stratigraphic position. The proportions of loss in mass observed in respective stages of pyrolysis in course of TG/DTG experiment are in correspondence with the observations of the released fractions in the Py-GC analysis. The Carpathian Menilite shales could be classified as source rocks with high oil generation potential. Also, the Lower Silurian and Ordovician shales are characterized by high oil-producing potential with a lower content of mineral matter. Cambrian rocks show a different character and gas-prone generation potential.
机译:在本文中,使用各种实验室热解方法来评估选定的石油源岩石。使用的方法是:岩羟戊解水,Py-GC热解技术和TG / DTG / DSC。最后一种方法的实验是根据三种不同的方法进行的。它们中的每一个都提供了不同的特定数据。所选择的岩石样品材料在地层位置,结构单元和收集地点(露头或钻孔)方面多样化。基于岩体 - 律分析结果,样品中的角蛋白可以被分类为II型。有关热解产品质量的其他信息是从Py-GC分析中获得的。由于所有三种实施的热解技术的组合,可以详细地评估源岩的产生电位的质量。在一些样品中,有机物质的氧化和热解发生在两个阶段,有机物质的复杂性的证据是什么。取决于有机物质的成熟度,在温度范围为450至580℃的温度范围内检测热解反应的最大值。成熟度水平随岩石地层位置增加。在TG / DTG实验中,在TG / DTG实验中,在热解的各个阶段中观察到的大规模损失的比例与Py-GC分析中释放的级分的观察结果相对应。喀尔巴阡植物美甲酸甲板可以被归类为具有高油发电潜力的源岩。此外,较低的硅藻土和奥陶语Shales的特点是具有较低含量的矿物质含量高的油生产潜力。寒武纪岩石展示了不同的性格和易于发电的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号