...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >Comparisons between Oral Anticoagulants among Older Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients
【24h】

Comparisons between Oral Anticoagulants among Older Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients

机译:较旧的非衰高性颤动患者口腔抗凝血剂的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES Older adult patients are underrepresented in clinical trials comparing non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin. This subgroup analysis of the ARISTOPHANES study used multiple data sources to compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding (MB) among very old patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) prescribed NOACs or warfarin. DESIGN Retrospective observational study. SETTING The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and three US commercial claims databases. PARTICIPANTS A total of 88 582 very old (aged ≥80?y) NVAF patients newly initiating apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin from January 1, 2013, to September 30, 2015. MEASUREMENTS In each database, six 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) cohorts were created for each drug comparison. Patient cohorts were pooled from all four databases after PSM. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of stroke/SE and MB. RESULTS The patients in the six matched cohorts had a mean follow‐up time of 7 to 9 months. Compared with warfarin, apixaban (HR = .58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .49‐.69), dabigatran (HR = .77; 95% CI = .60‐.99), and rivaroxaban (HR = .74; 95% CI = .65‐.85) were associated with lower risks of stroke/SE. For MB, apixaban (HR = .60; 95% CI = .54‐.67) was associated with a lower risk; dabigatran (HR = .92; 95% CI = .78‐1.07) was associated with a similar risk, and rivaroxaban (HR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.07‐1.24) was associated with a higher risk compared with warfarin. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke/SE and MB compared with dabigatran (stroke/SE: HR = .65; 95% CI = .47‐.89; MB: HR = .60; 95% CI = .49‐.73) and rivaroxaban (stroke/SE: HR = .72; 95% CI = .59‐.86; MB: HR = .50; 95% CI = .45‐.55). Dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of MB (HR = .77; 95% CI = .67‐.90) compared with rivaroxaban. CONCLUSION Among very old NVAF patients, NOACs were associated with lower rates of stroke/SE and varying rates of MB compared with warfarin. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1662–1671, 2019
机译:目标年龄较大的成年患者在临床试验中受到患者,比较非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝血剂(NOACS)和华法林。该亚群的亚群分析研究使用多种数据来源来比较中风/全身栓塞(SE)和主要出血(MB)在非常旧的非衰弱性心房颤动(NVAF)规定的Noacs或Warfarin的风险。设计回顾性观察研究。设定Medicare&amp的中心;医疗补助服务和三个美国商业索赔数据库。参与者共有88 582岁(≥80岁)NVAF患者新发起Apixaban,Dabigatran,Rivaroxaban,或Warfarin从2013年1月1日至2015年9月30日。每个数据库的测量,六个:1倾向得分为每个药物比较创建匹配(PSM)队列。 PSM后的所有四个数据库汇集了患者群体。 COX比例危害模型用于估计中风/硒和MB的危险比率(HRS)。结果六个匹配队列中的患者的平均随访时间为7至9个月。与华法林,Apixaban相比(HR = .58; 95%置信区间[CI] = .49-.69),Dabigatran(HR = .77; 95%CI = .60-.99)和Rivaroxaban(HR =。 74; 95%CI = .65-.85)与中风/ SE的较低风险相关。对于MB,Apixaban(HR = .60; 95%CI = .54-.67)与风险较低; Dabigatran(HR = .92; 95%CI = .78-1.07)与类似风险相关,罗昔扎班(HR = 1.16; 95%CI = 1.07-1.24)与华法林相比具有更高的风险。与Dabigatran(中风/ SE:HR = .65; 95%CI = .47-.89; MB:HR = .60; 95%Ci = .49- .73)和Rivaroxaban(中风/ SE:HR = .72; 95%CI = .59-.86; MB:HR = .50; 95%CI = .45-.55)。与Rivaroxaban相比,Dabigatran与Mb的风险较低,Mb的风险较低(HR = .77; 95%CI = .67-.90)。结论在非常古老的NVAF患者中,NOACs与较低的中风/ SE和与华法林相比的不同速率相关。 J AM Geriadr SOC 67:1662-1671,2019

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号