...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society >The Effect of a Comprehensive Dementia Care Management Program on End‐of‐Life Care
【24h】

The Effect of a Comprehensive Dementia Care Management Program on End‐of‐Life Care

机译:综合性痴呆护理管理计划对终生关怀的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Although Alzheimer disease and other dementias are life limiting, only a minority of these patients or their proxy decision makers participate in advance care planning. We describe end‐of‐life care preferences and acute care and hospice use in the last 6 months of life for persons enrolled in a comprehensive dementia care management program. DESIGN Observational, retrospective cohort. SETTING Urban, academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS A total of 322 persons enrolled in dementia care management after July 1, 2012, who died before July 1, 2016. INTERVENTION Dementia care comanagement model using nurse practitioners partnered with primary care providers and community organizations to provide comprehensive dementia care, including advance care planning. MEASUREMENTS Advance care preferences, use of Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST), hospice enrollment, and hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits in the last 6 months of life obtained from electronic health record data. RESULTS Nearly all decedents (99.7%, N = 321) had a goals‐of‐care conversation documented (median = 3 conversations; interquartile range = 2‐4 conversations), and 64% had advance care preferences recorded. Among those with recorded preferences, 88% indicated do not resuscitate, 48% limited medical interventions, and 35% chose comfort‐focused care. Most patients (89%) specified limited artificial nutrition, including withholding feeding tubes. Over half (54%) had no hospitalizations or ED visits in the last 6 months of life, and intensive care unit stays were rare (5% of decedents). Overall, 69% died on hospice. Decedents who had completed a POLST were more likely to die in hospice care (74% vs 62%; P = .03) and die at home (70% vs 59%; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS Enrollees in a comprehensive dementia care comanagement program had high engagement in advance care planning, high rates of hospice use, and low acute care utilization near the end of life. Wider implementation of such programs may improve end‐of‐life care for persons with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:443–448, 2019.
机译:背景/目标虽然阿尔茨海默病和其他痴呆症是生活限制,但这些患者的少数群体或其代理决策者只参加了预先关注的规划。我们描述了在综合性痴呆管理计划中纳入的人们过去6个月的终身保健偏好和急性护理和临终关怀。设计观察,回顾性队列。设置城市,学术医疗中心。 2012年7月1日之后,参与者共有322人参加痴呆症护理管理,他在2016年7月1日之前去世。干预痴呆护理复合模型使用护士从业者与初级护理提供者和社区组织合作,提供全面的痴呆症,包括提前关怀规划。测量先进的护理偏好,使用医生寿命持续治疗订单(Polst),临终关怀招待所和住院和急诊部(ED)在从电子健康记录数据中获得的过去6个月内访问。结果几乎所有的书籍(99.7%,n = 321)有一个记录的护理目标(中位数= 3次对话;四分位数范围= 2-4次对话),64%的录制了预付护理偏好。在记录偏好的人中,88%表示不复苏,有限的医疗干预措施有48%,35%选择了舒适焦点。大多数患者(89%)指定的人工营养有限,包括预扣料管。超过一半(54%)在过去6个月内没有住院或ed访问,并重症监护室住宿罕见(5%的食人士)。总体而言,69%的临界死亡。已完成策略的书籍更有可能在临终关怀护理中死亡(74%vs 62%; p = .03)并在家死亡(70%vs 59%; p = .04)。结论综合性痴呆护理中的入学人员在终身保育规划,临终关纸使用率高,临时急性护理利用率高,临时痴呆症的入学人员高。更广泛地实施此类计划可能会改善痴呆症人员的终身护理。 J AM Geriadr SOC 67:443-448,2019。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Reynolds Department of Geriatric MedicineUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences CenterOklahoma City;

    Multicampus Program in Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology David Geffen School MedicineUniversity;

    Division of Geriatrics and Supportive CareKaiser PermanenteVallejo California;

    Multicampus Program in Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology David Geffen School MedicineUniversity;

    Statistics Core David Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaLos Angeles California;

    Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research David Geffen School of;

    Multicampus Program in Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology David Geffen School MedicineUniversity;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 老年病学;
  • 关键词

    dementia; end of life; care management;

    机译:痴呆症;生命结束;护理管理;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号