首页> 外文期刊>Current opinion in solid state & materials science >To RMC or not to RMC? The use of reverse Monte Carlo modelling
【24h】

To RMC or not to RMC? The use of reverse Monte Carlo modelling

机译:去RMC还是不去RMC?反向蒙特卡洛建模的使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The 'classical' approach to structural studies of liquids and glasses, developed over the last 40 years, has been through derivation of the partial pair distribution functions and interpretation of these in terms of peak positions, coordination numbers etc. These parameters are then used to produce a simple picture of the average local structure, An alternative approach, strongly developed in the last decade, is full atomistic modelling of the structure, either by direct modelling of experimental data using techniques such as reverse Monte Carlo modelling (RMC) or empirical potential structure refinement (EPSR), or indirectly through simulation techniques such as Monte Carlo (MC) or molecular dynamics (MD), or more recently ab-initio MD. In this comment we raise some questions that should be considered before a decision is made to use any particular method. We then illustrate, with a particular example, why fully atomistic structural modelling, in this case RMC,can be so powerful even though the apparently limited information available from a diffraction pattern does not seem sufficient to obtain such detailed results.
机译:在过去的40年中,液体和玻璃结构的“经典”研究方法是通过导出部分对分布函数并根据峰位置,配位数等对这些函数进行解释。然后将这些参数用于生成平均局部结构的简单图片,在过去的十年中大力发展的另一种方法是对结构进行完整的原子建模,方法是使用反向蒙特卡洛建模(RMC)或经验潜力等技术对实验数据进行直接建模结构改进(EPSR),或通过模拟技术(例如蒙特卡洛(MC)或分子动力学(MD),或更近期的从头算MD)间接获得。在此评论中,我们提出一些在决定使用任何特定方法之前应考虑的问题。然后,我们以一个特定的例子来说明,为什么完全原子的结构建模(在这种情况下为RMC)如此强大,即使从衍射图样获得的显然有限的信息似乎不足以获得如此详细的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号