首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Direct or coincidental elimination of stable rotors or focal sources may explain successful atrial fibrillation ablation: On-treatment analysis of the CONFIRM trial (Conventional Ablation for AF with or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation)
【24h】

Direct or coincidental elimination of stable rotors or focal sources may explain successful atrial fibrillation ablation: On-treatment analysis of the CONFIRM trial (Conventional Ablation for AF with or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation)

机译:直接或巧合的稳定转子或焦点消除可以解释成功的心房颤动消融:对确认试验的接受治疗分析(具有或没有焦平脉冲和转子调制的AF传统消融)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: This study sought to determine whether ablation of recently described stable atrial fibrillation (AF) sources, either directly by Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM) or coincidentally when anatomic ablation passes through AF sources, may explain long-term freedom from AF. Background: It is unclear why conventional anatomic AF ablation can be effective in some patients yet ineffective in others with similar profiles. Methods: The CONFIRM (Conventional Ablation for AF With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation) trial prospectively revealed stable AF rotors or focal sources in 98 of 101 subjects with AF at 107 consecutive ablation cases. In 1:2 fashion, subjects received targeted source ablation (FIRM) followed by conventional ablation, or conventional ablation alone. We determined whether ablation lesions on electroanatomic maps passed through AF sources on FIRM maps. Results: Subjects who completed follow-up (n = 94; 71.2% with persistent AF) showed 2.3 ± 1.1 concurrent AF rotors or focal sources that lay near pulmonary veins (22.8%), left atrial roof (16.0%), and elsewhere in the left (28.2%) and right (33.0%) atria. AF sources were ablated directly in 100% of FIRM cases and coincidentally (e.g., left atrial roof) in 45% of conventional cases (p < 0.05). During a median (interquartile range) of 273 days (138 to 636 days) after one procedure, AF was absent in 80.3% of patients if sources were ablated but in only 18.2% of patients if sources were missed (p < 0.001). Freedom from AF was highest if all sources were ablated, intermediate if some sources were ablated, and lowest if no sources were ablated (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Elimination of stable AF rotors and focal sources may explain freedom from AF after diverse approaches to ablation. Patient-specific AF source distributions are consistent with the reported success of specific anatomic lesion sets and of widespread ablation. These results support targeting AF sources to reduce unnecessary ablation, and motivate studies on FIRM-only ablation. (The Dynamics of Human Atrial Fibrillation; NCT01008722)
机译:目的:该研究寻求确定最近描述的稳定心房颤动(AF)源(AF)源,直接通过焦点脉冲和转子调制(固件)或巧合,当解剖烧蚀通过AF来源时,可以解释AF的长期自由。背景:目前还不清楚为什么常规解剖学AF消融在一些患者中可以有效,但在具有类似型材的其他患者中尚未有效。方法:在107个连续消融病例中,在101个受试者中,确认(具有或不带焦平脉冲和转子调制的AF的传统消融有或没有焦平脉冲和转子调制)试验。在1:2时尚,受试者接受了靶向源消融(公司),然后单独进行常规消融,或单独常规消融。我们确定了通过在公司地图上通过AF源的电解映射上的消融病变。结果:完成后续的受试者(N = 94; 71.2%,持久性AF)显示2.3±1.1并发AF转子或侧重源,可在肺静脉附近(22.8%),左侧心房屋顶(16.0%),其他地方左(28.2%)和右(33.0%)Atria。 AF资源直接在100%的案例中被融列,并在45%的常规病例中巧合(例如,左侧心房屋顶)(P <0.05)。在一个程序后273天(138至636天)的中位数(四分位数范围)期间,如果患者的80.3%的患者缺席了AF,如果错过了,则只有18.2%的患者遗漏(P <0.001)。如果所有来源都被烧蚀,如果某些来源被烧蚀,并且如果没有烧蚀的话,则中间体的自由度是最高的结论:消除稳定的AF转子和焦点可以解释在多样化的消融方法之后的自由度。患者特异性AF源分布与报告的特定解剖病变集和广泛消融的成功一致。这些结果支持瞄准AF来源,以减少不必要的消融,并激励对实用消融的研究。 (人心房颤动的动态; NCT01008722)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号