...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Triple therapy with aspirin, prasugrel, and vitamin K antagonists in patients with drug-eluting stent implantation and an indication for oral anticoagulation
【24h】

Triple therapy with aspirin, prasugrel, and vitamin K antagonists in patients with drug-eluting stent implantation and an indication for oral anticoagulation

机译:三重疗法与阿司匹林,普拉布雷和维生素K拮抗剂患者患者洗脱植入支架植入和口服抗凝症的指示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate whether prasugrel may serve as an alternative to clopidogrel in patients with triple therapy. Background: Approximately 10% of patients who receive dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention have an indication for oral anticoagulation and are thus treated with triple therapy. The standard adenosine diphosphate receptor blocker in this setting is clopidogrel. Data regarding prasugrel as part of triple therapy are not available. Methods: We analyzed a consecutive series of 377 patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation and had an indication for oral anticoagulation between February 2009 and December 2011 and were treated with a 6-month regimen of aspirin and oral anticoagulation with either prasugrel or clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was a composite of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding at 6 months. The secondary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or definite stent thrombosis. Results: Twenty-one patients (5.6%) received prasugrel instead of clopidogrel. These patients had a higher-risk profile at baseline, and the majority had high platelet reactivity to clopidogrel. TIMI major and minor bleeding occurred significantly more often in the prasugrel compared with the clopidogrel group (6 [28.6%) vs. 24 [6.7%]; unadjusted hazard ratio (HR): 4.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9 to 11.4], p < 0.001; adjusted HR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.1 to 9.1], p = 0.03). There was no significant difference regarding the combined ischemic secondary endpoint (2 [9.5%] vs. 25 [7.0%]; unadjusted HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.3 to 6.1], p = 0.61). Conclusions: These findings suggest that substitution of prasugrel for clopidogrel in patients needing triple therapy increases the risk of bleeding. However, specific randomized trials are needed to define the role of newer adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists in this setting.
机译:目的:本研究试图评估普拉什雷是否可以作为三重治疗患者互补的氯吡格雷替代品。背景:大约10%的患者在经皮冠状动脉干预后接受双抗血小板治疗的患者对口腔抗凝的指示,因此用三重治疗治疗。该凝固中标准腺苷二磷酸受体阻断剂是氯吡格雷。关于普拉布雷的数据作为三重疗法的一部分不可用。方法:我们分析了连续的377名患者接受药物洗脱支架植入的患者,并在2009年2月和2011年2月之间表现出口腔抗凝,并患有6个月的阿司匹林和口服抗凝血方案,与普拉布雷或氯吡格雷治疗。主要终点是心肌梗死(TIMI)主要细胞溶栓和6个月轻微出血的复合物。次要终点是死亡,心肌梗死,缺血性卒中或明确支架血栓形成的复合材料。结果:二十一名患者(5.6%)接受普拉什菌而不是氯吡格雷。这些患者在基线上具有更高的风险性,并且大多数对氯吡格雷具有高的血小板反应性。与氯吡格雷基团相比,普里沙雷普里斯(6 [28.6%)与24 [6.7%]相比,普里氏菌和轻微出血的常剧发生得多不调整的危险比(HR):4.6,95%置信区间[CI]:1.9至11.4],P <0.001;调整后的HR:3.2,95%CI:1.1至9.1],P = 0.03)。组合缺血性次级终点没有显着差异(2 [9.5%]与25 [7.0%];未经调整的HR:1.4,95%CI:0.3至6.1],P = 0.61)。结论:这些研究结果表明,氯吡格雷替代需要三重治疗患者的氯吡格雷增加了出血的风险。然而,需要具体的随机试验来确定新腺苷二磷酸受体拮抗剂在该设置中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号