...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Estimating groundwater discharge to a lowland alluvial stream using methods at point-, reach-, and catchment-scale
【24h】

Estimating groundwater discharge to a lowland alluvial stream using methods at point-, reach-, and catchment-scale

机译:使用点,达到和集距量表的方法估算地下水排放到低地冲积流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The groundwater contribution to streamflow along a lowland alluvial stream in Denmark was estimated using a variety of methods and at different spatial scales. At the point-scale (less than a few metres), groundwater discharge to the stream was measured using seepage meters. At the reach-scale (0.5-1.5 km), groundwater discharge to the stream was estimated using differential streamflow gauging. And at the catchment-scale ( 1.5 km), groundwater discharge to the stream was estimated using hydrograph separation. The estimates of groundwater discharge obtained using point-scale measurements range from 12 to 41 cm/d which is lower than fluxes estimated at the reach-scale which range from 18 to 333 cm/d. This discrepancy was attributed to the partitioning of groundwater discharge into streambed seepage and bank seepage. On the other hand, the groundwater discharge estimates obtained using hydrograph separation were generally the highest and ranged from 194 to 289 cm/d. For this study, this discrepancy from the reach-scale estimates was attributed to the assumption that baseflow obtained using hydrograph separation represents groundwater discharge to the stream when part of the baseflow actually comes from artificial drainage systems. Anyhow, seepage meter measurements, differential streamflow gauging, and hydrograph separation showed similar trends. The increase in streamflow is mainly due to either groundwater discharge through the streambed and the banks in the lower part, or tile drainage discharge in the upper part of the catchment. Furthermore, estimation of uncertainty for the various groundwater discharge estimates showed that some of the flux estimates were insignificant compared with their propagated uncertainties. To this end, a novel method was developed to estimate the uncertainty of groundwater discharge estimates obtained by hydrograph separation. Overall, this paper shows that more than one method should be used to obtain a reliable estimate of groundw
机译:利用各种方法和不同的空间尺度估计丹麦在丹麦的低地冲积流的地下水贡献。在点刻度(小于几米),使用渗流仪测量流的地下水排放。在达拉范围(0.5-1.5 km),使用差分流流量测量估计流的地下水排放。在集水区(& 1.5 km)处,使用水文分离估计流的地下水排放。使用点尺度测量的地下水放电的估计范围为12至41cm / d,其低于达到达尺寸的助熔剂,其范围为18至333cm / d。这种差异归因于地下水排放到流渗流和银行渗流的划分。另一方面,使用水文分离获得的地下水排放估计通常是最高的,范围为194至289cm / d。对于该研究,来自REACH-SCAIC估计的这种差异归因于假设使用水文分离获得的基流代表流的地下水排放,当基流的一部分尤其来自人工排水系统时。无论如何,渗流仪表测量,差分流流量测量和水文分离显示出类似的趋势。流流量的增加主要是由于地下水通过流动的下部和堤岸排放,或者在集水区的上部的瓦片排水放电。此外,与其传播的不确定性相比,各种地下水排放估计的不确定度估计了一些通量估计值是微不一眼的。为此,开发了一种新的方法以估计通过水文分离获得的地下水排放估计的不确定性。总的来说,本文表明,应使用多种方法来获得地面的可靠估计

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号