...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >The influence of revetment types on soil denitrification in the adjacent tidal urban riparian zones
【24h】

The influence of revetment types on soil denitrification in the adjacent tidal urban riparian zones

机译:护垫类型对邻近城市河岸区土壤反硝化的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Riparian zones adjacent to revetments, as the last position of the entire riparian, are the last barrier to intercept runoff nitrogen pollution. They are also the areas where hyporheic exchange occurs when soil is submerged by river water. Revetments can be classified into impervious revetments and permeable revetments according to their permeability. It has been realized that impervious revetments are not conducive to exchange between rivers and riparian zones. Tidal riparian zones undergo water level changes more frequently than normal riparian zones. Thus, revetments in tidal riparian zones may have a greater impact on nitrogen cycling. However, the quantitative influence of revetment types on nitrogen removal in adjacent tidal urban riparian zones is not clear, resulting in the lack of scientific support for the revetments construction. Removal of nitrogen from riparian zones primarily occurs through plant uptake, microbial immobilization, and denitrification. However, nitrogen will be released into soil again after plants die or microorganisms decompose. While denitrification can completely remove nitrogen through transferring nitrate (NO3-) into gaseous nitrous oxide (N2O) and dinitrogen (N-2). In this study, we used three revetment types (permeable concrete pile revetments (PR), impervious masonry stone revetments (IR), and no revetments (NR)) as examples to quantify the effects of revetment types on soil denitrification in adjacent tidal urban riparian zones at three distances from the revetments (0.3 m, 0.6 m, 1.0 m) by measuring the soil (0-20 cm) denitrification potential (DP) and N2O production rates (N2OR). Results indicated that compared with soil denitrification (0.32 +/- 0.06 mg kg(-1)h(-1)) in natural riparian zones (NR), PR could significantly improve it (0.97 +/- 0.07 mg kg(-1)h(-1)), while IR significantly inhibited it (0.23 +/- 0.04 mg kg(-1)h(-1)) in the adjacent tidal urban riparian zones (P < 0.01). Changes in soil properties caused by revetm
机译:作为整个河岸的最后一个位置,靠近修道院的河岸区是拦截径流氮污染的最后一个障碍。它们也是在河水淹没土壤时发生过度交换的区域。根据其渗透率,可以归类于不透水的修道院和可渗透的修饰。已经意识到,不利的修道院不利于河流和河岸区之间交换。潮汐河岸区比普通河岸区域更频繁地发生水位。因此,潮汐河岸区域的破坏可能对氮循环产生更大的影响。然而,护垫类型对邻近潮汐城市河岸区氮去除的定量影响尚不清楚,导致对修道院建设的科学支持缺乏科学支持。从河岸区除去氮气主要通过植物摄取,微生物固定化和反硝化发生。然而,在植物死亡或微生物分解后,氮气将再次释放到土壤中。否则脱氮可以通过将硝酸盐(NO 3-)转移到气态氮氧化物(N2O)和二氮(N-2)中完全除去氮气。在这项研究中,我们使用了三种护垫类型(可渗透的混凝土桩修复(PR),不透水砌体石头修道(IR),也没有修复(NR)是例子,以量化护套类型对邻近潮气城市河岸土壤脱氮的影响通过测量土壤(0-20cm)脱氮电位(DP)和N2O生产率(N2OR),从修饰的三个距离(0.3米,0.6米,1.0米)的区域。结果表明,与土壤反硝化(0.32 +/- 0.06mg(-1)H(-1))中的自然河岸区(NR)相比,PR可显着改善它(0.97 +/- 0.07 mg kg(-1) H(-1)),虽然IR显着抑制了相邻的潮汐城市河岸区(P <0.01)中的(0.23 +/- 0.04 mg(-1)H(-1))。 ReveTM引起的土壤性能变化

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号