...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences >Impact of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer Aerosol Optical Depth and AirNow PM2.5 assimilation on Community Multi-scale Air Quality aerosol predictions over the contiguous United States
【24h】

Impact of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer Aerosol Optical Depth and AirNow PM2.5 assimilation on Community Multi-scale Air Quality aerosol predictions over the contiguous United States

机译:中等分辨率成像光谱辐射计的影响气溶胶光学深度和Airnow PM2.5对邻近美国的社区多尺度空气质量气溶胶预测的同化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this study, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) and AirNow PM2.5 measurements are assimilated into the Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) model using an optimal interpolation (OI) method. Over a 30 day test period in July 2011, three assimilation configurations were used in which MODIS AOD and AirNow PM2.5 measurements were first assimilated separately before being assimilated simultaneously. The background error covariance is estimated using both the National Meteorological Center approach and the Hollingsworth-Lnnberg method. The AOD observations from Terra are assimilated at 17Z and the Aqua AOD observations are assimilated at 20Z each day. AirNow PM2.5 measurements are assimilated 4 times a day at 00Z, 06Z, 12Z, and 18Z. Model performances are measured by the daily averaged and domain-averaged biases and the root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) obtained by comparing the predictions with the AirNow PM2.5 observations that were not assimilated. Either assimilating the MODIS AOD or assimilating the AirNow PM2.5 alone helps PM2.5 predictions over the entire 30 days. The case that assimilates the observations from both sources has the best performance. While the CMAQ PM2.5 results exhibit exaggerated diurnal variations compared to the AirNow measurements, this is not as severe at rural sites as at urban or suburban sites. It was also found that assimilating the total AOD observations is more beneficial for correcting the PM2.5 underestimations than directly assimilating the AirNow PM2.5 measurements every 6 h. While the simple approach of applying the AOD scaling factors uniformly throughout the vertical columns proved effective, it is liable to produce substantial errors. This is demonstrated by a high-AOD event.
机译:在该研究中,使用最佳插值(OI)方法将适度分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)气雾光学深度计(MODIS)和AIRNow PM2.5测量分析到社区多尺度空气质量(CMAQ)模型中。在2011年7月在30日测试期间,使用了三种同化配置,其中Modis AOD和Airnow PM2.5在同时同时同时同时同时进行测量。使用国家气象中心方法和Hollingsworth-Lnnberg方法估算了背景误差协方差。 Terra的AOD观测在17Z中同化,Aqua Aod观察每天20z在20z上同化。 Airnow PM2.5测量在00z,06z,12z和18z时每天吸收4次。模型性能由日常平均和域平均偏差测量,通过将预测与Airnow PM2.5观察结果进行比较而获得的根平均误差(RMSE)。同样同化Modis AOD或同化Airnow PM2.5,单独有助于在整个30天内有助于PM2.5预测。同化两个来源观测的情况具有最佳性能。虽然CMAQ PM2.5结果表现出与Airnow测量相比夸大的昼夜变化,但在城市或郊区网站上的农村地点并不严重。还发现,同化AOD的总AOD观察更有利于校正PM2.5的低估比直接同化AIRNow PM2.5测量每6小时。虽然在整个垂直柱均匀地应用AOD缩放因子的简单方法证明有效,但易于产生大量误差。这是由高AOD事件展示的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号