首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Association of emergency department length of stay with safety-net status.
【24h】

Association of emergency department length of stay with safety-net status.

机译:应急部门与安全网络状态保持联系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

CONTEXT: Performance measures, particularly pay for performance, may have unintended consequences for safety-net institutions caring for disproportionate shares of Medicaid or uninsured patients. OBJECTIVE: To describe emergency department (ED) compliance with proposed length-of-stay measures for admissions (8 hours or 480 minutes) and discharges, transfers, and observations (4 hours or 240 minutes) by safety-net status. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The 2008 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) ED data were stratified by safety-net status (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition) and disposition (admission, discharge, observation, transfer). The 2008 NHAMCS is a national probability sample of 396 hospitals (90.2% unweighted response rate) and 34 134 patient records. Visits were excluded for patients younger than 18 years, missing length-of-stay data or dispositions of missing, other, left against medical advice, or dead on arrival. Median and 90th percentile ED lengths of stay were calculated for each disposition and admission/discharge subcategories (critical care, psychiatric, routine) stratified by safety-net status. Multivariable analyses determined associations with length-of-stay measure compliance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Emergency Department length-of-stay measure compliance by disposition and safety-net status. RESULTS: Of the 72.1% ED visits (N = 24 719) included in the analysis, 42.3% were to safety-net EDs and 57.7% were to non-safety-net EDs. The median length of stay for safety-net was 269 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 178-397 minutes) for admission vs 281 minutes (IQR, 178-401 minutes) for non-safety-net EDs; 156 minutes (IQR, 95-239 minutes) for discharge vs 148 minutes (IQR, 88-238 minutes); 355 minutes (IQR, 221-675 minutes) for observations vs 298 minutes (IQR, 195-440 minutes); and 235 minutes (IQR, 155-378 minutes) for transfers vs 239 minutes (IQR, 142-368 minutes). Safety-net status was not independently associated with compliance with ED length-of-stay measures; the odds ratio was 0.83 for admissions (95% CI, 0.52-1.34); 1.03 for discharges (95% CI, 0.83-1.27); 1.05 for observations (95% CI, 0.57-1.95), 1.30 for transfers (95% CI, 0.70-2.45]); or subcategories except for psychiatric discharges (1.67, [95% CI, 1.02-2.74]). CONCLUSION: Compliance with proposed ED length-of-stay measures for admissions, discharges, transfers, and observations did not differ significantly between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals.
机译:背景信息:表现措施,特别是履行薪酬,对安全网机构的关心不成比例的股份或未保险患者的股份来说可能产生意外的后果。目的:描述应急部门(ED)遵守拟议的入学长度措施(8小时或480分钟),并通过安全网状态放电,转移和观察(4小时或240分钟)。设计,设定和参与者:2008年国家医院的动态医疗保​​健调查(NHAMCS)ED数据被安全网状态分层(疾病控制和预防定义的中心)和处置(入场,排放,观察,转移)。 2008年的NHAMC是396家医院的国家概率样本(90.2%的未加权响应率)和34名134名患者记录。对于18岁的患者,患者被排除在外,缺少遗失的数据或缺失的丢失的差异,其他,左转医疗建议,或抵达时死亡。通过安全净状态分层分层的每个处置和入场/放电子类别(临界护理,精神病犬)计算中位数和第90百分位的住宿时间。多变量分析确定与保持长度衡量规定的关联。主要观察措施:急诊部门持续长度衡量符合性处理和安全网络状态。结果:72.1%ED访问(N = 24 719)中包含的分析,42.3%是安全网EDS,57.7%是非安全网EDS。安全网的中位长度为269分钟(句子范围[IQR],178-397分钟)用于非安全网EDS的281分钟(IQR,178-401分钟); 156分钟(IQR,95-239分钟)出院,与148分钟(IQR,88-238分钟); 355分钟(IQR,221-675分钟)观察与298分钟(IQR,195-440分钟); 235分钟(IQR,155-378分钟)用于转移与239分钟(IQR,142-368分钟)。安全网络状态并未与符合ED保持措施无关;入学的赔率比为0.83(95%CI,0.52-1.34); 1.03放电(95%CI,0.83-1.27); 1.05用于观察结果(95%CI,0.57-1.95),1.30用于转移(95%CI,0.70-2.45]);或者除精神辐射除外(1.67,[95%CI,1.02-2.74]除外)。结论:遵守拟议的入学,排放,转移和观察措施,安全网和非安全网医院之间没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号