...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >A randomized controlled trial comparing motivational interviewing in education to structured diabetes education in teens with type 1 diabetes.
【24h】

A randomized controlled trial comparing motivational interviewing in education to structured diabetes education in teens with type 1 diabetes.

机译:随机对照试验比较型糖尿病型糖尿病教育教育励志访谈。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE To compare motivational interviewing-based education (MI) and structured diabetes education (SDE) for improving A1C and psychosocial measures in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This study was a 9-month randomized controlled trial comparing MI (n = 21) to SDE (n = 23). Interventions were at baseline (T0) and 3 months (T1), with A1C and psychosocial measures obtained at 6 months (T2) and 9 months (T3). RESULTS Over the 6 months of follow-up, the SDE group had lower adjusted mean A1C value (least squares mean 10.31, SE 0.32) than the MI group (least squares mean 11.35, SE 0.34) (P = 0.03, d = -0.66). There were no differences on any of the psychosocial measures. CONCLUSIONS SDE is effective at improving metabolic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes educators were proficient in learning MI.
机译:目的比较基于励志的面试教育(MI)和结构性糖尿病教育(SDE),用于改善1型糖尿病青少年的A1C和心理社会措施。 研究设计和方法本研究是一个9个月的随机对照试验比较MI(n = 21)到SDE(n = 23)。 干预措施是基线(T0)和3个月(T1),A1C和6个月(T2)和9个月(T3)获得的心理社会措施。 结果在6个月的随访中,SDE组的调整后平均值降低(最小二乘意味着10.31,SE 0.32)(最小二乘意味着11.35,SE 0.34)(P = 0.03,D = -0.66 )。 任何心理社会措施都没有差异。 结论SDE有效改善1型糖尿病患者的青少年代谢对照。 糖尿病教育者精通学习MI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号