...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes care >Estimating the Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparison of Several Risk Scores: The Cohorte Lausannoise study.
【24h】

Estimating the Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparison of Several Risk Scores: The Cohorte Lausannoise study.

机译:估计发展2型糖尿病的风险:几种风险评分的比较:Cohorte Lausannoise研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE To compare in the Swiss population the results of several scores estimating the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a single-center, cross-sectional study conducted between 2003 and 2006 in Lausanne, Switzerland. Overall, 3,251 women and 2,937 men, aged 35-75 years, were assessed, of which 5,760 (93%) were free from diabetes and included in the current study. The risk of developing type 2 diabetes was assessed using seven different risk scores, including clinical data with or without biological data. Participants were considered to be eligible for primary prevention according to the thresholds provided for each score. The results were then extrapolated to the Swiss population of the same sex and age. RESULTS The risk of developing type 2 diabetes increased with age in all scores. The prevalence of participants at high risk ranged between 1.6 and 24.9% in men and between 1.1 and 15.7% in women. Extrapolated to the Swiss population of similar age, the overall number of participants at risk, and thus susceptible to intervention, ranged between 46,708 and 636,841. In addition, scores that included the same clinical variables led to a significantly different prevalence of participants at risk (4.2% [95% CI 3.4-5.0] vs. 12.8% [11.5-14.1] in men and 2.9% [2.4-3.6] vs. 6.0% [5.2-6.9] in women). CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of participants at risk for developing type 2 diabetes varies considerably according to the scoring system used. To adequately prevent type 2 diabetes, risk-scoring systems must be validated for each population considered.
机译:目的探讨瑞士人群的比较估计2型糖尿病风险的几分比。研究设计和方法这是瑞士洛桑2003年至2006年的单一中心,横断面研究。总体而言,3,251名妇女和2,937名年龄在35-75岁的男性被评估,其中5,760(93%)免于糖尿病,并包括在目前的研究中。使用七种不同的风险评分评估显示2型糖尿病的风险,包括有或没有生物数据的临床数据。根据每个分数提供的门槛,参与者被认为有资格预防。然后将结果推断为同性和年龄的瑞士人群。结果,在所有分数中,发育2型糖尿病的风险增加。男性高风险的参与者的患病率在1.6%和24.9%之间,女性介于1.1和15.7%之间。推断给类似年龄的瑞士人群,风险的总体数量,并因此易受干预,范围在46,708和636,841之间。此外,包括相同的临床变量的分数导致风险的参与者的显着不同(4.2%[95%[95%CI 3.4-5.0],男性和2.9%[2.4-3.6]妇女中的6.0%[5.2-6.9])。结论根据所使用的评分系统,患有2型糖尿病风险的参与者的患病率各不相同。为了充分防止2型糖尿病,必须针对所考虑的每种人群验证风险评分系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号