...
首页> 外文期刊>Vaccine >Factors influencing vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in three informal settlements in Lusaka, Zambia
【24h】

Factors influencing vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in three informal settlements in Lusaka, Zambia

机译:影响疫苗接受的因素在赞比亚卢萨卡三个非正式定居点犹豫不决

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

IntroductionHeterogeneous coverage threatens to compromise the effectiveness of immunization programs in Zambia. Demand-creation initiatives are needed to address this; however, there is incomplete understanding of why vaccine coverage is suboptimal. We investigated overarching perceptions on vaccine acceptability, hesitancy, and accessibility at three informal settlements in Lusaka, Zambia.MethodsNested within a cholera vaccination uptake study, we sought to understand overarching perceptions on vaccines’ hesitancy in three informal settlements in Lusaka, Zambia. We conducted 48 focus group discussions with a convenience sample of laypersons, lay healthcare workers, neighbourhood health committee members and vaccinators.ResultsBoth laypersons and community-based health actors reported high vaccine acceptance though several sources of hesitancy were reported. Traditional remedies, alcohol use and religious beliefs emerged as drivers of vaccine hesitancy, likely reinforced by a background of distrust towards western medicine. Also mentioned were previous adverse events, fear of injections and low perceived need for immunization. Limited understanding of how vaccines work and overlapping local terms for vaccine and other medical concepts created confusion and inaccurate views and expectations. Some reported refusing injections to avoid pain and perceived risk of infection. Discussants emphasised the importance of education and preferred mobile immunization campaigns, with weekend to reach those with poor access and delivered by a combination of professional and volunteer workers.ConclusionsVaccine hesitancy in Zambia is underpinned by many factors including personal experiences with vaccinations, alternative belief models, limited knowledge, deep misunderstanding about how vaccines work, and barriers to access. To overcome these, community-driven models that incorporate factual communication by professionals and operate outside of traditional hours, may help. Better research to understand community preferences for vaccine uptake could inform interventions to improve immunization coverage in Zambia.
机译:引入列源覆盖率威胁要损害赞比亚免疫计划的有效性。需要提出创建举措来解决这个问题;但是,对为什么疫苗覆盖是次优的原因存在不完整。我们调查了在卢萨卡,赞比亚的三个非正式住区对疫苗可接受性,犹豫不决和可访问性的总体看法。在霍乱疫苗接种的研究中,我们试图了解对赞比亚卢萨卡三个非正规住区的疫苗犹豫不决的总体看法。我们与便利人员进行了48次焦点小组讨论,方便的拉德斯顿,界外医疗委员会成员和疫苗接种者。虽然报告了几个犹太呼,但报告了高疫苗接受,但仍报告了高疫苗接受。传统的补救措施,酒精使用和宗教信仰被出现为疫苗犹豫的司机,可能是对西医不信任的背景增强。还提到了以前的不良事件,担心注射和低的疫苗的需要。有限地了解疫苗如何工作和重叠疫苗和其他医学概念的当地术语创造了混乱和不准确的观点和期望。有些人报告拒绝注射以避免疼痛和感染风险。讨论者强调了教育和首选移动免疫活动的重要性,周末达到了穷人的人,由专业和志愿者的组合提供了穷人.Clclusionsvaccine在赞比亚犹豫不决的是,许多因素包括个人经历,包括疫苗接种,替代信仰模式,知识有限,深深的误解,疫苗如何工作以及访问的障碍。为了克服这些,社区驱动的模型,通过专业人士融入事实沟通,并在传统时间以外运营,可能有所帮助。更好的研究以了解疫苗摄取的社区偏好可以提供干预措施,以改善赞比亚的免疫报道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号