首页> 外文期刊>Vaccine >Measuring vaccine hesitancy: Field testing the WHO SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy survey tool in Guatemala
【24h】

Measuring vaccine hesitancy: Field testing the WHO SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy survey tool in Guatemala

机译:测量疫苗犹豫不决:现场测试Who Sage工作组在危地马拉的疫苗犹豫不决调查工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundDespite safe and effective childhood immunizations, decreased acceptance of vaccines has become an emerging global problem. The WHO SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy developed a common diagnostic tool, the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS), to identify and compare hesitancy in different global settings. We field tested the VHS in rural and urban Guatemala.MethodsWe analyzed data from the enrollment visit of a study conducted at four public health clinics in Guatemala. Infants ages 6?weeks-6?months presenting for their first wellness visit were enrolled March-November 2016. Parents completed a demographic survey that included the 10 dichotomous and 10 Likert scale VHS questions. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact for categorical and ANOVA test for continuous variables were used to assess significance levels in survey differences. We conducted a factor analysis to assess the Likert scale questions.ResultsOf 1088 families screened, 871 were eligible and 720 (82.7%) participated. No parent had ever refused a vaccination, and only eight parents (1.1%) had been reluctant or hesitated to get a vaccination for their children. However, only 40.8% (n?=?294) of parents said that they think most parents like them have their children vaccinated with all the recommended vaccines. Factor analysis identified two underlying constructs that had eigenvalues of 1.0 or greater and a substantive lack of variability in response across the Likert scale. There were consistent differences between how study clinics responded to the ordinal scaling.ConclusionOur results suggest problems with interpretation of the VHS, especially in the presence of vaccine shortages and using a Likert scale that does not resonate across diverse cultural settings. Our factor analysis suggests that the Likert scale items are more one-dimensional and do not represent the multiple constructs of vaccine hesitancy. We suggest more work is needed to refine this survey for improved reliability and validity.Clinical Trial Registry:NCT02567006.
机译:Backgrudumance安全有效的儿童免疫,降低了疫苗的接受已成为一个新兴的全球问题。 WHO SAGE工作组在疫苗犹豫不决,发达了一个常见的诊断工具,疫苗犹豫了秤(VHS),以识别和比较不同的全球环境中的犹豫。我们在农村和城市危地马拉的VHS测试了VHS.methodswe分析了在危地马拉四个公共卫生诊所进行的研究中进行的入学访问中的数据。婴儿6岁?周 - 6?为他们的第一个健康访问提供的月份是2016年3月至11月。父母完成了一个人口调查,其中包括10个二分和10个李克特量表VHS问题。 Chi-Square或Fisher对连续变量的分类和ANOVA测试用于评估调查差异中的显着性水平。我们进行了一个因素分析,以评估李克特量表的问题。筛选的1088个系列,871个符合条件,720(82.7%)参加。没有父母曾拒绝接种疫苗,只有八个父母(1.1%)一直不愿意为孩子接种疫苗。然而,只有40.8%(n?=?294)父母表示,他们认为大多数父母喜欢他们的父母让孩子接种所有推荐的疫苗。因子分析确定了两个底层构建体,其具有1.0或更大的特征值,并且在李克特量表中具有响应的实质性缺乏可变性。研究诊所如何应对序数缩放的响应之间存在一致的差异.Conclusionour结果表明VHS解释的问题,特别是在存在疫苗短缺并使用不会在不同文化环境中产生共鸣的李克特量表。我们的因素分析表明,李克特级别项目更为一维,不代表疫苗犹豫不决的多种构造。我们建议需要更多的工作来改进可靠性和有效性的调查。临床试验登记处:NCT02567006。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号