首页> 外文期刊>Zootaxa >Nomenclatural notes on some taxa of Bidessus Sharp and designation of a neotype (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Hydroporinae: Bidessini)
【24h】

Nomenclatural notes on some taxa of Bidessus Sharp and designation of a neotype (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Hydroporinae: Bidessini)

机译:关于竞争对手的一些分类票据的命名票据和新型(Coleoptera:Dytiscidae:Hydroporinae):Bidessini)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The nomenclature of some taxa of the tribe Bidessini is dealt with. Currently, the names of these taxa are mostly interpreted as synonyms of Bidessus unistriatus (Goeze, 1777). The four oldest names for this species are shown to be nomina dubia due to insufficient descriptions and lack of name-bearing types. These names are in their original combinations Dyticus parvulus O.F. Muller, 1776, Dytiscus unistriatus Goeze, 1777, Dytiscus unistriatus Schrank, 1781, and Dyticus monostriatus Geoffroy in Fourcroy, 1785. The uncertainties of these species-level names also affect the identity of the genus-level names Bidessus Sharp, 1882, and Hydroglyphus Motschulsky, 1853a, meaning that the stability of nomenclature in the tribe Bidessini is considerably threatened. To eliminate this threat by clarifying the taxonomic status and the type locality of each of these nominal taxa, one and the same male specimen is designated as neotype for unistriatus Goeze, unistriatus Schrank and monostriatus Geoffroy in Fourcroy, and thus these three names become objective synonyms. The neotype is selected from modern material collected near Paris (France) because the type localities of all three taxa include "Paris environs". This is the locality from which Geoffroy (1762) described the non-binominal "ditique a une seule strie" and to which is referred in the descriptions of the latter three taxa. To prevent the threat of the stability by the name parvulus O.F. Muller it is intended to make an application to the ICZN in order to suppress this name for the purpose of priority.
机译:处理了一些部落的竞争对手的命名。目前,这些分类群的名称主要被解释为Bidessus Unistiatus(Goeze,1777)的同义词。由于描述不足和缺少贵族类型,这一物种的四个最古老的名称被证明是Nomina Dubia。这些名称在原来的组合Dyticus parvulus O.f. Muller,1776年,Dytiscus Unistiatus Goeze,1777,Dytiscus Unistiatus Schrank,1781年和Dyticus Monostriatus Geoffroy在Fourcoy,1785年。这些物种级别名称的不确定性也影响了Bidessus Sharp,1882和肝内属的属性的身份MOTSCHULSKY,1853A,这意味着部落BIDESSINI中的命名稳定性受到严重威胁。为了消除这种威胁,通过澄清各个标称分类队的分类状态和各个标本的类型,同一个男性标本被指定为Unistriatus Goeze,Unistiatus Schrank和Monostriatus Geoffroy的新型,因此这三个名称成为客观的同义词。新型选自在巴黎附近(法国)附近的现代材料,因为所有三个分类群的类型的地方包括“巴黎环境”。这是Geoffroy(1762)描述了非二进制族“ditique a une see shie strie”的局部性,并且在后者三个分类群的描述中被提及。为了防止名字o.f的稳定性威胁。 Muller旨在将应用程序应用于ICZN,以便以优先级的目的抑制此名称。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号