...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion: The Journal of the American Association of Blood Banks >Parental versus non‐parental–directed donation: an 11‐year experience of infectious disease testing at a pediatric tertiary care blood donor center
【24h】

Parental versus non‐parental–directed donation: an 11‐year experience of infectious disease testing at a pediatric tertiary care blood donor center

机译:父母与非父母为导向的捐赠:儿科三级护理血液供体中心的传染病测试的11年性经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND Directed donation is associated with a higher prevalence of donations that are positive for infectious disease markers; however, little is known about the positive rates among parental‐directed, non‐parental–directed, and allogeneic donations. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We reviewed blood‐collection records from January 1997 through December 2008, including infectious disease results, among parental, non‐parental, and community donations. Infectious disease rates were compared by Mann‐Whitney U test. RESULTS In total, 1532 parental, 4910 non‐parental, and 17,423 community donations were examined. Among parental donors, the median rate of positive infectious disease testing was 8.66% (interquartile range (IQR), 4.49%) for first‐time donors and 1.26% (IQR, 5.86%) for repeat donors; among non‐parental donors, the rate was 1.09% (IQR, 0.98%) for first‐time donors and 0% (IQR, 0.83%) for repeat donors; and, among community donors, the rate was 2.95% (IQR, 1.50%) for first‐time donors and 0.45% (IQR, 0.82%) for repeat donors. The mean rate of positive infectious disease testing for first‐time parental donors was significantly higher (7.63%), whereas all repeat donors had similar rates. However, the rate of positive infectious disease testing among first‐time non‐parental donors was significantly lower than that in the other groups, especially for the period from 2001 through 2008. CONCLUSION First‐time non‐parental and community donors had significantly higher infectious disease risk than the respective repeat donors. First‐time parental donors had the highest rates of positive infectious disease testing. We suggest that first‐time parental blood donation should be discouraged. Repeat community donors or first‐time non‐parental donors provide a safer alternative. These findings can foster better patient education, donor selection, and possibly a reduced risk of infectious disease.
机译:背景,定向捐赠与对传染病标记的阳性呈阳性的较高普遍性有关;然而,关于父母指导,非父母的阳性率和同种异体捐赠的阳性率很少。研究设计与方法我们审查了1997年1月至2008年12月的血液收集记录,包括父母,非父母和社区捐赠中的传染病结果。通过Mann-Whitney U测试进行了传染病率。综述成果总共为1532名父母,4910名非父母和17,423名社区捐赠。在父母捐助者中,阳性传染病检测的中值率为8.66%(综合体(IQR),4.49%),用于重复捐赠者的1.26%(IQR,5.86%);在非父母的供体中,首次供体的速率为1.09%(IQR,0.98%),重复供体的0%(IQR,0.83%);而且,在社区捐助者中,首次供体的速度为2.95%(IQR,1.50%),重复供体的0.45%(IQR,0.82%)。第一次父母供体的阳性传染病检测的平均速率显着高(7.63%),而所有重复供体具有相似的速率。然而,首次非父母供体之间的阳性传染病检测率明显低于其他群体,特别是在2001年至2008年期间。结论首次非父母和社区供体具有显着高的传染性疾病风险比相应的重复供体。首次父母捐助者具有最高的阳性传染病检测率。我们建议鼓励首次父母献血。重复社区捐助者或首次非父母捐赠者提供更安全的替代品。这些发现可以促进更好的患者教育,捐助者选择,并且可能降低传染病的风险。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Divisions of Laboratory Medicine and HematologyCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders Sheikh Zayed;

    Divisions of Laboratory Medicine and HematologyCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders Sheikh Zayed;

    Divisions of Laboratory Medicine and HematologyCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders Sheikh Zayed;

    Divisions of Laboratory Medicine and HematologyCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders Sheikh Zayed;

    Divisions of Laboratory Medicine and HematologyCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders Sheikh Zayed;

    Divisions of Laboratory Medicine and HematologyCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders Sheikh Zayed;

    Divisions of Laboratory Medicine and HematologyCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders Sheikh Zayed;

    Divisions of Laboratory Medicine and HematologyCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders Sheikh Zayed;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 治疗学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号