首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of rheumatology >Content and Face Validity and Feasibility of 5 Candidate Instruments for Psoriatic Arthritis Randomized Controlled Trials: The PsA OMERACT Core Set Workshop at the GRAPPA 2017 Annual Meeting
【24h】

Content and Face Validity and Feasibility of 5 Candidate Instruments for Psoriatic Arthritis Randomized Controlled Trials: The PsA OMERACT Core Set Workshop at the GRAPPA 2017 Annual Meeting

机译:3候选人的银屑病关节炎随机对照试验的内容与面部有效性和可行性:PSA Omeract核心集研讨会在Grappa 2017年度会议上

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPAV)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Core Set working group is in the process of selecting core instruments for PsA clinical trials. During a 2-h workshop and breakout group discussions at the GRAPPA 2017 annual meeting in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, participants discussed the first sel of candidate instruments to be taken through the OMERACT Filter 2.1 instrument selection process: 66/68 swollen/tender joint count (66/68JC), Spondyloarthritis Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) enthesitis index, patient's global assessment (GRAPPA and OMERACT formulations), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaires 9 and 12, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue. Based on the assessment of domain match (content and face validity) and feasibility according lo the OMERACT instrument selection criteria, the working group recommends continuing with appraisal of construct validity and discrimination for 66/68JC, SPARCC, PsAID 9 and 12. HAQ-DI, and FACIT-Fatigue. In addition, it recommends repeating the OMERACT Filter 2.1 process for patient global instruments because of insufficient votes. Additional sets of candidate instruments for the PsA core instrument set will be evaluated in a similar process.
机译:集团研究和牛皮癣的评估和银屑病关节炎(GRAPPAV)风湿病(OMERACT)银屑病关节炎(PSA)核心组工作组-Outcome办法是选择核心手段PsA的临床试验的过程。期间在荷兰阿姆斯特丹格拉帕2017年会2小时车间和分组讨论,与会代表讨论通过OMERACT过滤器2.1仪表选型过程中采取的候选仪表第一SEL:66/68肿胀/压痛关节计数(66 / 68JC),加拿大脊柱关节炎协会(SPARCC)附着点炎指数,患者的总体评估(GRAPPA和OMERACT制剂),健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI),疾病的银屑病关节炎的影响(PsAID)问卷9和12,和慢性疾病治疗(FACIT)疲劳功能评价。基于根据LO的OMERACT仪器选择标准的域匹配(内容和脸的有效性)和可行性评估,该工作组建议与建构效度的评价和判别为66 / 68JC,SPARCC继续,PsAID 9和12 HAQ-DI和FACIT疲劳。此外,建议重复的,因为选票不足病人的全球文书OMERACT过滤器2.1的过程。候选仪器为PSA核仪器组的附加集合将在一个类似的过程来评价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号