首页> 外文期刊>Current Eye Research >Comparative evaluation of uniplex, nested, semi-nested, multiplex and nested multiplex PCR methods in the identification of microbial etiology of clinically Suspected Infectious Endophthalmitis
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of uniplex, nested, semi-nested, multiplex and nested multiplex PCR methods in the identification of microbial etiology of clinically Suspected Infectious Endophthalmitis

机译:单重,嵌套,半嵌套,多重和嵌套多重PCR方法在临床可疑传染性眼内炎的微生物病原学鉴定中的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: This study is aimed to determine the utility of various polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods in vitreous fluids (VFs) for detecting the infectious genomes in the diagnosis of infectious endophthalmitis in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Methods: This prospective and consecutive analysis included a total of 66 VFs that were submitted for the microbiological evaluation, which were obtained from 66 clinically diagnosed endophthalmitis patients presented between November 2010 and October 2011 at the tertiary eye care referral centre in South India. Part of the collected VFs were subjected to cultures and smears, and the remaining parts were utilized for five PCR methods: uniplex, nested, semi-nested, multiplex and nested multiplex after extracting DNA, using universal eubacterial and Propionibacterium acnes species-specific primer sets targeting 16S rRNA gene in all bacteria and P. acnes, and panfungal primers, targeting 28S rRNA gene in all fungi. Results: Of the 66 VFs, five (7.5%) showed positive results in smears, 16 (24%) in cultures and 43 (65%) showed positive results in PCRs. Among the 43 positively amplified VFs, 10 (15%) were positive for P. acnes genome, one for panfungal genome and 42 (62%) for eubacterial genome (including 10 P. acnes positives). Among 42 eubacterial-positive VFs, 36 were positive by both uniplex (first round) and multiplex (first round) PCRs, while nested (second round) and nested multiplex (second round) PCRs produced positive results in 42 and 41 VFs, respectively. Of the 43 PCR-positive specimens, 16 (37%) had positive growth (15 bacterial and one fungal) in culture. Of 50 culture-negative specimens, 27 (54%) were showed positive amplification, of which 10 were amplified for both P. acnes and eubacterial genomes and the remaining 17 were for eubacterial genome alone. Conclusions: Nested PCRs are superior than uniplex and multiplex PCR. PCRs proved to be a powerful tool in the diagnosis of endophthalmitis, especially for detecting uncultured microbes.
机译:目的:本研究旨在确定玻璃体液(VF)中各种聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法在检测感染性眼内炎方面的敏感性和特异性方面的实用性。方法:这项前瞻性和连续分析包括总共66项VF,这些微生物已提交微生物学评估,这些是从2010年11月至2011年10月在南印度三级眼科转诊中心就诊的66位经临床诊断的眼内炎患者中获得的。收集的部分VF进行培养和涂片,其余部分用于五种PCR方法:提取DNA后使用通用真细菌和痤疮丙酸杆菌种特异性引物对进行单重,嵌套,半嵌套,多重和嵌套多重PCR靶向所有细菌和痤疮丙酸杆菌中的16S rRNA基因,以及针对所有真菌中28S rRNA基因的泛真菌引物。结果:在66个VF中,有5个(7.5%)在涂片中显示阳性结果,在培养物中有16个(24%)在PCR中显示43个(65%)阳性。在43个阳性扩增的VF中,痤疮丙酸杆菌基因组为10个(15%),泛真菌基因组为阳性,真细菌基因组42个(62%)对痤疮丙酸杆菌(包括10个痤疮丙酸杆菌阳性)。在42个真细菌阳性VF中,单重(第一轮)和多重(第一轮)PCR均为36阳性,而巢式(第二轮)和巢式多重(第二轮)PCR分别在42和41个VF中产生阳性结果。在43个PCR阳性标本中,有16个(37%)在培养中呈阳性生长(15个细菌和1个真菌)。在50个培养阴性标本中,有27个(54%)显示出阳性扩增,其中痤疮丙酸杆菌和真细菌基因组均有10个扩增,其余17个仅针对真细菌基因组。结论:巢式PCR优于单重和多重PCR。 PCR被证明是诊断眼内炎的有力工具,特别是对于检测未培养的微生物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号