首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation for women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HEALTH): a parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation for women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HEALTH): a parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial

机译:腹腔镜Suprercalcy子宫切除术与患有大颅(健康)的女性的子宫内膜消融(健康):一个平行组,开放标签,随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Heavy menstrual bleeding affects 25% of women in the UK, many of whom require surgery to treat it. Hysterectomy is effective but has more complications than endometrial ablation, which is less invasive but ultimately leads to hysterectomy in 20% of women. We compared laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with endometrial ablation in women seeking surgical treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding.
机译:背景技术大量月经出血影响了英国的25%的女性,其中许多人需要手术治疗它。 子宫切除术是有效的,但具有比子宫内膜消融更多的并发症,其侵入性较小,但最终导致20%的女性中的子宫切除术。 我们将腹腔镜Supracteracal子宫切除术与妇女的子宫内膜消融进行了对妇女的子宫内膜消融,寻求大规模月经出血的外科治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号