首页> 外文期刊>Current Science: A Fortnightly Journal of Research >Behaviour genetics in the post-genomics era: From genes to behaviour and vice versa
【24h】

Behaviour genetics in the post-genomics era: From genes to behaviour and vice versa

机译:后基因组学时代的行为遗传学:从基因到行为,反之亦然

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Approaches to understanding behaviour in an evolutionary context can be grouped into two broad categories: behaviour genetics and behavioural ecology. In this paper, I briefly discuss the development of these two fields, to highlight some serious shortcomings in their focus and/or approach to understanding behaviour. These shortcomings have been pointed out by numerous researchers before, but it seems to be an opportune time to revisit this issue because present day methods are making it increasingly likely that some of these gaps in our understanding of behaviour can now be addressed experimentally. Early behaviour genetics essentially led to neurogenetics due to its focus on single-gene mutations affecting behaviour, which were often mutations affecting the nervous system. This line of work, consequently, diverged considerably from the study of behaviour per se and, although it contributed a great deal to our understanding of how the components of the nervous system work, it did not really shed much light on behaviour at the organismal level. More recent approaches in behaviour genetics include quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, which is an attempt to go beyond the black box approach of classical quantitative genetics and to track down loci mediating behavioural differences among individuals. Behavioural ecology provided a counter point to traditional behaviour genetics by explicitly focusing on ultimate causes, and trying to understand behaviour in terms of its adaptive (fitness) value. However, behavioural ecology too has at its core a conceptual lacuna, which is the absence of knowledge of the genotype-to-phenotype mapping for most behavioural traits. This conceptual lacuna is serious, and it affects not just behavioural ecology but most attempts to understand the evolutionary dynamics of complex and composite phenotypes that are, in terms of gene expression, far removed from the genome. What I have to say, therefore, applies broadly to attempts to understand the evolutionary shaping of complex phenotypes, and not just to studies of behaviour. I suggest that we really need a new and enlarged conception of, and approach to, behaviour genetics; an approach that will utilize recent advances in genetic technology, but yet be rooted in a holistic, organismal weltanschaung. I briefly describe some examples of this approach that I believe highlight the potential that this new behaviour genetics has to enrich and round off our understanding of behaviour from an evolutionary perspective.
机译:理解进化背景下的行为的方法可以分为两大类:行为遗传学和行为生态学。在本文中,我简要地讨论了这两个领域的发展,以突出它们在关注和/或理解行为的方法上的一些严重缺陷。这些缺点以前已被众多研究人员指出,但现在似乎是重新审视此问题的最佳时机,因为当今的方法越来越使我们对行为的理解中的某些差距现在可以通过实验来解决。早期行为遗传学实质上是导致神经遗传学的原因,因为它专注于影响行为的单基因突变,而这些突变通常是影响神经系统的突变。因此,这一工作方式与行为本身的研究大相径庭,尽管它为我们对神经系统各部分的工作方式的理解做出了很大贡献,但它并没有真正从机体层面上阐明行为。行为遗传学中的最新方法包括定量性状基因座(QTL)映射,这是一种超越经典定量遗传学黑盒方法并追踪基因座在个体之间介导的行为差异的尝试。行为生态学通过明确地关注最终原因,并试图根据其适应性(适应性)值来理解行为,从而为传统行为遗传学提供了一个针对点。但是,行为生态学也具有一个概念缺陷,那就是缺乏大多数行为特征的基因型到表型作图的知识。这种概念上的缺陷是严重的,它不仅影响行为生态学,而且影响大多数理解复杂和复合表型的进化动力学的努力,这些复杂和复合表型在基因表达方面与基因组相去甚远。因此,我不得不说的是,它广泛地用于尝试理解复杂表型的进化形式,而不仅限于行为研究。我建议我们确实需要对行为遗传学进行新的,扩大的概念和方法。这种方法将利用基因技术的最新进展,但植根于整体的有机世界观。我简要描述了这种方法的一些示例,我相信这些示例突出了这种新的行为遗传学从进化的角度丰富和完善我们对行为的理解的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号