【24h】

Awards and rewards

机译:奖励与奖励

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sometimes the past suddenly intrudes upon us. So it was, when the controversy over the Arjuna award to Milkha Singh reminded me of another day and another age. The late 1950s and the first couple of years of the decade of the sixties were a time of hope and optimism. Independent India was still young and as a boy I was thrilled to hear of Milkha Singh's glorious quarter mile run across Rome's Olympic Stadium in 1960. It was a time of the radio and the newsreel that preceded a film in the cinema theatres. It was a time when we still thought of the hockey gold in the Olympics and Ramanathan Krishnan could even finesse his way into a Wimbledon singles semi-final. Cricket was not the all-consuming force that it is today. Gavaskar and Kapil Der were still to appear on the horizon; Tendulkar was not born. It was a time when a new world order appeared possible; John Kennedy's assumption of the US presidency promised a future that was to turn into a mirage. The disastrous border war with China lay ahead and the demoralizing food shortages of the mid-1960s were yet to be anticipated. The green revolution and Mrs Gandhi had not yet entered our lives. It was in this ambience that Milkha Singh raised the bar of sporting achievement by sprinting to within a tenth of a second of an Olympic medal, breaking the existing record in the course of his spectacular run. Why did such a man not receive this country's highest national award for achievement in sport, even when it was first instituted? Why did the committees in the Sports Ministry suddenly rediscover Milkha Singh? In the long years since the Rome Olympics there have been many sportsmen and women honoured for far lesser achievements. Milkha Singh's instinctive reaction of rejecting the award, highlighted the infirmities of the entire selection process, sparking a debate on the mechanisms by which we acknowledge men and women of distinction in sport. Are awards important? Undoubtedly they are; particularly in a directly competitive sphere of activity like sport. Was Milkha Singh a stray omission? Obviously not, since there have been many plaintive cries in the past few weeks from once famous names.
机译:有时过去突然闯入我们。就是这样,当米尔卡·辛格(Milsha Singh)获得阿朱那(Arjuna)奖的争议让我想起了又一天又一个时代。 1950年代后期和60年代的头几年是充满希望和乐观的时期。独立的印度还很年轻,小时候我很高兴听到米尔哈·辛格(Milka Singh)1960年在罗马奥林匹克体育场(Olympic Olympic Stadium)上奔跑的辉煌四分之一英里的路程。那是广播和新闻媒体时代,在电影院上映电影之前。那个时候,我们仍然想到奥运会上的曲棍球金牌,而Ramanathan Krishnan甚至可以精打细算地进入温网单打半决赛。板球并不是今天的全部消耗力量。加瓦斯卡(Kavaskar)和卡皮尔·德尔(Kapil Der)仍将出现在地平线上。 Tendulkar尚未出生。在那个时候,新的世界秩序似乎可能出现。约翰·肯尼迪(John Kennedy)担任美国总统一职,预示着将变成海市rage楼的未来。与中国的灾难性边界战争即将到来,1960年代中期令人沮丧的粮食短缺仍未预料到。绿色革命和甘地夫人尚未进入我们的生活。正是在这种氛围中,米尔卡·辛格(Milka Singh)冲刺达到了奥运奖牌的十分之一秒,从而打破了现有的纪录,从而提高了体育成就的水准。为什么这样的人即使最初提出这项运动,也没有获得该国最高的国家成就奖?为什么体育部的委员会突然重新发现米尔莎·辛格(Milka Singh)?自罗马奥运会以来的漫长岁月里,有许多运动员和妇女因成绩差得多而受到嘉奖。米尔莎·辛格(Milka Singh)拒绝颁奖的本能反应,突显了整个选拔过程中的软弱,引发了关于我们承认男子和女子在运动中表现卓越的机制的辩论。奖励重要吗?无疑地,它们是。特别是在像体育这样直接竞争的活动领域。 Milkha Singh是流浪者吗?显然不是,因为过去几周来曾有过许多著名人物的哀求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号