【24h】

Recognition of merit

机译:功绩表彰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recognizing academic merit of a scientist for an award/prize/honour, howsoever objective the method may be, one cannot claim not to have left out a deserving case for consideration. Do all of us who matter for recognizing merit have the requisite knowledge about the work being done in all the active fields of even one discipline? Obviously one/two active fields and their top workers are certain to be left out. Therefore a mechanism should be devised to invite nominations so as to cover all the active fields of research in any discipline for consideration of merit and for awards/rewards/prizes, etc.
机译:在承认科学家获得奖励/奖状/荣誉的学术价值时,无论该方法有多客观,都不能声称没有遗漏值得考虑的案例。我们每个人对荣誉的认识都很重要,即使在一个学科的所有活跃领域中,对他们所做的工作都有必要的知识吗?显然,一两个活跃领域及其高层工作者肯定会被排除在外。因此,应该设计一种机制来邀请提名,以便涵盖任何学科中所有活跃的研究领域,以考虑功绩以及奖励/奖励/奖赏等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号