首页> 外文期刊>Current Science: A Fortnightly Journal of Research >Mapping international collaboration in science in Asia through coauthorship analysis
【24h】

Mapping international collaboration in science in Asia through coauthorship analysis

机译:通过共同作者分析绘制亚洲科学领域的国际合作图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Using data from SCI 1998, we have analysed international collaboration in science in 11 Asian countries. Papers resulting from collaboration among these countries and with G7, European Union, OECD and selected Latin American and African countries were classified under subject categories to characterize each country's total and collaborated scientific literature output. Japan (16.4% of internationally collaborated papers), India (17.6%) and Taiwan (16.3%) recorded an internationalization index less than 30 whereas China (28.5%), South Korea (24.5%) and Hong Kong (36.2%) recorded an internationalization index greater than 40. India, China and South Korea have collaborated more in physics, whereas the other eight countries have collaborated more in life sciences. In almost all fields and for virtually all Asian countries, USA is the most preferred collaborating partner, All G7 countries collaborate more with China, which is emerging as a leader in regional collaboration, than with India. [References: 13]
机译:使用1998年SCI的数据,我们分析了11个亚洲国家在科学领域的国际合作。这些国家之间以及与七国集团,欧盟,经合组织以及部分拉美和非洲国家的合作所产生的论文被归类为主题类别,以表征每个国家的整体和合作科学文献产出。日本(国际合作论文的16.4%),印度(17.6%)和台湾(16.3%)的国际化指数均低于30,而中国(28.5%),韩国(24.5%)和香港(36.2%)的国际化指数均低于30。国际化指数大于40。印度,中国和韩国在物理学方面的合作更多,而其他八个国家在生命科学方面的合作更多。在几乎所有领域以及几乎所有亚洲国家中,美国都是最受青睐的合作伙伴。所有七国集团国家与中国的合作更多,而中国正在成为区域合作的领导者,而不是与印度的合作。 [参考:13]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号