首页> 外文期刊>Current Science: A Fortnightly Journal of Research >Indian economics and Indian scholarly publishing: is there room for Current Science?
【24h】

Indian economics and Indian scholarly publishing: is there room for Current Science?

机译:印度经济学和印度学术出版:当前科学还有空间吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Multidisciplinary science journals include a few papers in economics. However, very few papers in economics appear in Current Science, itself a multidisciplinary journal. This article reports the results obtained from our analysis of the possible reasons for this situation. A study of almost 6500 articles from the journal's archives led us to the conclusion that the proportion of the journal's papers in the field of economics is very small, less than 0.5%. Thus we conducted an e-mail survey with 43 Indian authors publishing in Indian economics journals, asking them whether or not they had submitted any manuscript to Current Science and what were the reasons for this decision. Then, following a quantitative analysis, we constructed a model that represented the different argumentation strategies used by our sample of authors. Our main conclusion is that it is a lack of communication between economics researchers and the journal itself that creates disciplinary gaps in the multidisciplinary nature of Current Science.
机译:多学科科学期刊包括经济学方面的几篇论文。但是,经济学几乎没有论文发表在《当代科学》(Current Science)上,《 Current Science》本身是一本多学科期刊。本文报告了从我们对这种情况的可能原因的分析中获得的结果。对来自该期刊档案的近6500篇文章的研究得出的结论是,该期刊论文在经济学领域中所占的比例很小,不到0.5%。因此,我们对43位在印度经济学期刊上发表论文的印度作者进行了电子邮件调查,询问他们是否向“当前科学”提交了稿件,以及做出此决定的原因是什么。然后,在进行定量分析之后,我们构建了一个模型,该模型代表了作者样本所使用的不同论证策略。我们的主要结论是,经济学研究人员与期刊本身之间缺乏沟通,造成了《现代科学》的多学科性质的学科空白。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号