...
首页> 外文期刊>Physical chemistry chemical physics: PCCP >Reply to the 'Comment on 'Extent of conjugation in diazonium-derived layers in molecular junction devices determined by experiment and modelling'' by R. L. McCreery, S. K. Saxena, M. Supur and U. Tefashe, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, DOI: 10.1039/d0cp02412k
【24h】

Reply to the 'Comment on 'Extent of conjugation in diazonium-derived layers in molecular junction devices determined by experiment and modelling'' by R. L. McCreery, S. K. Saxena, M. Supur and U. Tefashe, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, DOI: 10.1039/d0cp02412k

机译:回复通过实验和建模的分子结装置中的重氮衍生层中的缀合的缀合程度的回复“评论”“”,麦克雷纳,萨克拉·萨克拉,M. supur和U. tefashe,phy。 化学。 化学。 Phys,2020,22,Doi:10.1039 / d0cp02412k

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Our paper [Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019,21, 16762] is the subject of a comment that clarifies a flaw in analysis of STM data. We accept the comment in regard to the aspect ratio considerations, but we also further clarify the main conclusions of our paper, and provide a molecular scale schematic using the data presented in the comment to help refine the original conclusions. Taken together, this shows that models presented in the literature may benefit from including more fine structure details, as better understanding may emerge from such considerations. This was the intent of our original article, and we thank the comment authors for the chance to clarify these points.
机译:我们的论文[物理。 化学。 化学。 物理。,2019,21,16762]是评论的主题,阐明了对STM数据分析的缺陷。 我们接受关于纵横比考虑因素的评论,但我们还进一步澄清了我们纸张的主要结论,并使用评论中提出的数据提供了分子尺度原理图来帮助优化原始结论。 总之,这表明文献中呈现的模型可能受益于包括更精细的结构细节,因为可以从这些考虑中出现更好的理解。 这是我们原始文章的意图,并感谢评论作者有机会澄清这些积分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号