...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring?
【24h】

Patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring?

机译:与互动式视觉辅助助剂的患者特异性精神排练:值得探索的一条路线?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Surgeons of today are faced with unprecedented challenges; necessitating a novel approach to pre-operative preparation which takes into account the specific tests each case poses. In this study, we examine patient-specific mental rehearsal for pre-surgical practice and assess whether this method has an additional effect when compared to generic mental rehearsal. Methods Sixteen medical students were trained how to perform a simulated laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC). After baseline assessments, they were randomised to two equal groups and asked to complete three SLCs involving different anatomical variants. Prior to each procedure, Group A practiced mental rehearsal with the use of a pre-prepared checklist and Group B mental rehearsal with the checklist combined with virtual models matching the anatomical variations of the SLCs. The performance of the two groups was compared using simulator provided metrics and competency assessment tool (CAT) scoring by two blinded assessors. Results The participants performed equally well when presented with a “straight-forward” anatomy [Group A vs. Group B—time sec: 445.5 vs. 496 p ?=?0.64—NOM: 437 vs. 413 p ?=?0.88—PL cm: 1317 vs. 1059 p ?=?0.32—per: 0.5 vs. 0 p ?=?0.22—NCB: 0 vs. 0 p ?=?0.71—DVS: 0 vs. 0 p ?=?0.2]; however, Group B performed significantly better [Group A vs. B Total CAT score—Short Cystic Duct (SCD): 20.5 vs. 26.31 p ?=?0.02 η 2 ?=?0.32—Double cystic Artery (DA): 24.75 vs. 30.5 p ?=?0.03 η 2 ?=?0.28] and committed less errors (Damage to Vital Structures—DVS, SCD: 4 vs. 0 p ?=?0.03 η 2 =0.34, DA: 0 vs. 1 p ?= 0.02 η 2 =?0.22). in the cases with more challenging anatomies. Conclusion These results suggest that patient-specific preparation with the combination of anatomical models and mental rehearsal may increase operative quality of complex procedures.
机译:摘要背景技术外科医生面临前所未有的挑战;需要采用新颖的预惯例准备方法,该方法考虑到每种情况的特定测试。在这项研究中,我们检查患者特异性精神排练,以进行前手术实践,并评估与通用精神排练相比此方法是否具有额外效果。方法如何培训16名医学生如何进行模拟腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SLC)。在基线评估后,它们随机分为两个相等的群体,并要求完成三个涉及不同解剖变量的SLC。在每个程序之前,使用预先准备的清单和B组心理排练,与核对表单结合使用匹配SLC的解剖变量的虚拟模型,组进行练习的清单和B组精神排练。使用Simulator提供了两组的性能,提供了两个盲化评估员的指标和能力评估工具(CAT)评分。结果参与者在呈现“直接”解剖学时同样良好地进行[组Vs. B组:445.5与496 P?=?0.64-NOM:437与413 P?=?0.88-PL cm:1317与1059 p?=?0.32-per:0.5与0 p?= 0.22-ncb:0与0 p?= 0.71-DVS:0与0 p?=?0.2];然而,B组显着更好地进行[组A与B组总猫得分 - 短囊性管道(SCD):20.5与26.31p≤x≤0.02η2≤Δ= 0.32-双囊性动脉(DA):24.75 Vs. 30.5 p?= 0.03η2?=?0.28]并提出较少的错误(对重要结构的损坏-DVS,SCD:4与0 p?=0.03η2= 0.34,DA:0与1 p?= 0.02η2= 0.22)。在更具挑战性解剖的情况下。结论这些结果表明,患者特异性制剂与解剖模型和精神排练的组合可能会增加复杂程序的术语质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号