首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Short-term and long-term results of a randomized study comparing high tie and low tie inferior mesenteric artery ligation in laparoscopic rectal anterior resection: subanalysis of the HTLT (High tie vs. low tie) study
【24h】

Short-term and long-term results of a randomized study comparing high tie and low tie inferior mesenteric artery ligation in laparoscopic rectal anterior resection: subanalysis of the HTLT (High tie vs. low tie) study

机译:随机研究的短期和长期成果比较高领和低领带的腹腔镜直肠前切除术中的低领和低领肠道动脉结扎:HTLT(高领带与低领带)研究的细胞分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BackgroundIn rectal anterior resection, a clear consensus regarding the optimal level of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation does not exist because of a lack of randomized trials. We conducted a randomized trial to determine if the IMA should be tied at the origin (high tie, HT) or distal to the left colic artery (low tie, LT) (HTLT study). This study is a subanalysis of HTLT study for laparoscopic surgery.MethodsAll candidates were randomly divided into the HT or LT groups. The lymph node dissection around the origin of the IMA was performed in the LT group. The stratified factor was the approach (open or laparoscopy). Evaluation parameters were operative factors, short-term and long-term results. In the present study, laparoscopic surgeries were examined as subgroup analysis.ResultsFrom June 2006 to September 2012, 331 patients were registered. Two hundred and fifteen patients (107 for HT: 108 for LT) underwent laparoscopic surgeries. There was no difference between the groups in background. The incidence of anastomotic leakage (HT: LT %) showed no significant differences for grade 2 or higher (11.2:9.3), and grade 3 or higher (2.8:4.6). There were no differences in operative time (200:205min), blood loss (15:15ml), number of dissected lymph nodes (22:20), and postoperative hospital stay (10:10days). The incidence of bowel obstruction in HT was significant (3.7 vs. 0%, p=0.043). There were no significant differences in overall survival (5-year: 91.3 vs. 90.2%, p=0.850) and disease-free survival (5-year: 83.2 vs. 78.0%, p=0.525). There were no differences in the first recurrent site and death reason between both groups. The risk factors for leakage were being male and an anastomotic level in a multivariate analysis by logistic regression.ConclusionThe IMA ligation level was unrelated to anastomotic leakage. No significant difference was detected in long-term results between HT and LT.
机译:背景暴食前切除,由于缺乏随机试验,不存在关于较低肠系膜动脉(IMA)连接的明确共识。我们进行了一项随机试验,以确定IMA是否应在原始(高领带,HT)或远离左侧绞痛(低领带,LT)(HTLT研究)上绑定。本研究是对腹腔镜手术的HTLT研究的细胞分析。方法将候选人随机分为HT或LT组。在LT组中进行围绕IMA的起源的淋巴结解剖。分层因子是方法(开放或腹腔镜检查)。评估参数是可操作的因素,短期和长期结果。在本研究中,腹腔镜手术被检查为亚组分析。从2006年6月至2012年9月期间,331名患者注册了331名患者。二百五十岁患者(107例HT:108)达到腹腔镜手术。背景中的群体之间没有区别。吻合口渗漏的发生率(HT:LT%)显示出2级或更高(11.2:9.3)没有显着差异,3级或更高(2.8:4.6)。手术时间(200:205min),失血(15:15ml),解剖淋巴结(22:20)的数量没有差异,术后医院住院(10:10日)。 HT中肠梗阻的发生率很大(3.7 Vs. 0%,P = 0.043)。整体生存率没有显着差异(5年:91.3与90.2%,P = 0.850)和无病生存率(5年:83.2 vs. 78.0%,P = 0.525)。两个群体之间的第一个经常性网站和死亡原因没有差异。通过Logistic回归泄漏的危险因素是雄性和吻合体的多元分析中的吻合体水平。结论IMA连接水平与吻合泄漏不相关。在HT和LT之间的长期结果中没有检测到显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号