...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Mesh fixation using novel bio-adhesive coating compared to tack fixation for IPOM hernia repair: in vivo evaluation in a porcine model
【24h】

Mesh fixation using novel bio-adhesive coating compared to tack fixation for IPOM hernia repair: in vivo evaluation in a porcine model

机译:用新型生物粘合剂涂层的网格固定与IPOM Hernia修复的粘性固定相比:在猪模型中的体内评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundMesh fixation in hernia repair is currently based on penetrating sutures or anchors, with proven early and late complications such as pain, adhesions, erosions, and anchor migration. In an attempt to reduce these complications, a bio-adhesive-based self-fixation system was developed. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance and safety of this novel self-adhesive mesh (LifeMesh) by comparing it with standard tack fixation.MethodsA full-thickness abdominal wall defect was created bilaterally in 24 pigs. The defects were measured 14days later, and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repairs were performed. In each animal, both LifeMesh and a titanium tack-fixed control, either uncoated polypropylene mesh (PP) or composite mesh (Symbotex), were used. After 28 and 90days, we performed macroscopic evaluation and analyzed the fixation strength, shrinkage, adhesion scores, and histopathology in all samples.ResultsMeasurements at both time points revealed that LifeMesh had fully conformed to the abdominal wall, and that its fixation strength was superior to that of the tack-fixated Symbotex and comparable to that of the tack-fixated PP. Shrinkage in all groups was similar. Adhesion scores with LifeMesh were lower than with PP and comparable with Symbotex at both time points. Histology demonstrated similar tissue responses in LifeMesh and Symbotex. Lack of necrosis, mineralization, or exuberant inflammatory reaction in all three groups pointed to their good progressive integration of the mesh to the abdominal wall. By 28days the bio-adhesive layer in LifeMesh was substantially degraded, allowing a gradual tissue ingrowth that became the main fixation mode of this mesh to the abdominal wall.ConclusionsThe excellent incorporation of LifeMesh to the abdominal wall and its superior fixation strength, together with its low adhesion score, suggest that LifeMesh may become a preferred alternative for abdominal wall repair.
机译:背景技术目前基于穿透缝合线或锚点,经过验证的早期和晚期并发症,如疼痛,粘连,糜烂和锚迁移。为了减少这些并发症,开发了一种生物粘合剂的自固定系统。本研究的目的是通过将其与标准粘性固定进行比较来评估这部新型自粘网格(Lifemesh)的性能和安全。方法在24只猪中双侧产生全厚腹壁缺损。缺点以后14天测量,并进行腹腔镜腹膜内围网网(IPOM)修理。在每只动物中,使用Lifemesh和钛粘性固定控制,未涂覆的聚丙烯网(PP)或复合网(Symbotex)。在28和90天后,我们在所有样品中进行了宏观评估并分析了所有样品中的固定强度,收缩,粘附分数和组织病理学。两个时间点的治疗方法显示,Lifemesh已经完全符合腹壁,并且其固定强度优于Tack-Cipleated Symbotex的那个和与粘性PP的粘性PP相当。所有群体的收缩都是相似的。具有Lifemesh的粘附分数低于PP,并与两个时间点的Symbotex相当。组织学展示了Lifemesh和Symbotex中的类似组织反应。在所有三个组中缺乏坏死,矿化或繁殖的炎症反应指出了它们对腹壁的良好逐渐整合到腹壁。在28天的情况下,Lifemesh中的生物粘合剂层显着降低,允许将该网眼的主要固定模式成为腹壁的逐渐变形.Clusionsthe将Lifemesh的优异融入腹壁及其优异的固定强度,以及其优异的固定强度低粘附分数,表明Lifemesh可能成为腹壁修复的首选替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号