首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >A prospective evaluation of short-term and long-term results from colonic stenting for palliation or as a bridge to elective operation versus immediate surgery for large-bowel obstruction.
【24h】

A prospective evaluation of short-term and long-term results from colonic stenting for palliation or as a bridge to elective operation versus immediate surgery for large-bowel obstruction.

机译:对短期和长期结果的前瞻性评估来自粘连的结肠支架或作为桥梁的桥梁与巨大肠梗阻立即手术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The efficacy and safety of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement as a bridge to elective surgery or definitive palliation versus emergency operation to treat colorectal obstruction is debated. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with colorectal obstruction treated using different strategies.Subjects admitted to the authors' department with colorectal obstruction (n = 134) were studied prospectively. They underwent endoscopic stenting as a bridge to elective surgery (SEMS group: n = 49) or for definitive palliation (n = 34). A total of 51 patients underwent immediate surgery without stenting (NO-SEMS). Treatment was decided by the senior on-call surgeon.Placement of SEMS was technically successful in 95.3 % and clinically successful in 98.7 % of cases. The short-term complications in the SEMS group were perforation (n = 1, 1.2 %), migration (n = 4, 4.9 %), occlusion (n = 4, 4.9 %), colon bleeding (n = 3, 3.7 %), and abdominal pain (n = 6, 7.4 %). The postoperative complication rate was 32.7 % in the SEMS group versus 60.8 % in the NO-SEMS group (P = 0.005), with a significant reduction in wound infections (26.5 vs 54.9 %; P = 0.004), abdominal abscess (14.3 vs 39.2 %; P = 0.006), respiratory morbidity (10.2 vs 37.3 %; P = 0.002), and intensive care treatment (10.2 vs 33.3 %; P = 0.007). The median postoperative hospital stay was 10 versus 15 days (P = 0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate in both groups was 2 %. Long-term follow-up evaluation showed less incisional hernia (6.3 vs 22.0 %; P = 0.04) and definitive stoma formation (6.3 vs 26.0 %; P = 0.01) in the SEMS group than in the NO-SEMS group, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a benefit for the SEMS group (log-rank test, 0.004). The long-term SEMS-related complication rate for the palliative patients was 43.8 %. The hospital readmission rate for SEMS complications was 34.4 %. Overall clinical success was 81.2 %.In case of colorectal obstruction, endoscopic colon stenting as a bridge to elective operation should be considered as the treatment of choice for resectable patients given the significant advantages for short- and long-term outcomes. Palliative stenting is effective but associated with a high rate of long-term complications.
机译:疗效和自膨式金属支架(SEMS)放置的安全的桥梁,择期手术或明确缓解对急诊手术治疗大肠癌梗阻辩论。这项研究的目的是评估大肠癌患者梗阻成果使用承认作者的部门与结肠梗阻(N = 134)不同strategies.Subjects进行前瞻性研究处理。他们经历内窥镜支架为桥梁,以择期手术(SEMS组:n = 49)或用于减轻明确(N = 34)。共有51例患者接受立即手术无支架植入术(NO-SEMS)。治疗被SEMS的高级应召surgeon.Placement决定是95.3%,在技术上成功的病例中98.7%的临床成功。该SEMS组中的短期并发症为穿孔(n = 1时,1.2%),迁移(N = 4,4.9%),闭塞(N = 4,4.9%),结肠出血(N = 3,3.7%)和腹痛(N = 6,7.4%)。术后并发症发生率为32.7%的SEMS组中相对于NO-SEMS组中60.8%(P = 0.005),并在伤口感染一个显著减少(26.5 VS 54.9%; P = 0.004),腹部脓肿(14.3 VS 39.2 %; P = 0.006),呼吸道的发病率(10.2和37.3%; P = 0.002),和重症监护治疗(10.2 VS 33.3%; P = 0.007)。平均术后住院时间是10对15天(P = 0.001)。院内死亡率在这两个群体为2%。长期随访评估显示出较少的切口疝(6.3 VS 22.0%; P = 0.04)和最终的气孔形成(6.3 VS 26.0%; P = 0.01)的SEMS组中分别比NO-SEMS基,英寸Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示的SEMS组(log-rank检验,0.004)是有利的。用于治标患者长期SEMS相关并发症发生率为43.8%。对于SEMS并发症再入院率是34.4%。总体临床成功是大肠癌梗阻,为择期手术的桥梁应被视为治疗的首选给出了短期和长期结果的显著优势可切除患者结肠镜下支架置入术的81.2%。在案件。姑息支架置入术是有效的,但长期并发症的发生率较高有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号