首页> 外文期刊>Social science and medicine >Sensitivity of measuring the progress in financial risk protection to survey design and its socioeconomic and demographic determinants: A case study in Rwanda
【24h】

Sensitivity of measuring the progress in financial risk protection to survey design and its socioeconomic and demographic determinants: A case study in Rwanda

机译:测量对调查设计的财务风险保护进展的敏感性及其社会经济和人口统制因素 - 以卢旺达为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Reliable and comparable information on households with catastrophic health expenditure (HCHE) is crucial for monitoring and evaluating our progress towards achieving universal financial risk protection. This study aims to investigate the sensitivity of measuring the progress in financial risk protection to survey design and its socioeconomic and demographic determinants. Using the Rwanda Integrated Living Conditions Survey in 2005 and 2010/2011, we derived the level and trend of the percentage of the HCHE using out-of-pocket health spending data derived from (1) a health module with a two-week recall period and six (2005)/seven (2010/2011) survey questions (Method 1) and (2) a consumption module with a four-week/ten-/12-month recall period and 11(2005)/24 (2010/2011) questions (Method 2). Using multilevel logistic regression analysis, we investigated the household socioeconomic and demographic characteristics that affected the sensitivity of estimating the HCHE to survey design. We found that Method 1 generated a significantly higher HCHE estimate (9.2%, 95% confidence interval 8.4%-10.0%) than Method2 (7.4%, 6.6%-8.1%) in 2005 and lower estimate (5.6%, 5.2%-6.1%) than Method 2 (8.2%, 7.6% 8.7%) in 2010/2011. The estimated trends of the HCHE using the two methods were not consistent between the two years. A household's size, its income quintile, having no under-five children, and educational level of its head were positively associated with the consistency of its HCHE status when using the two survey methods. Estimates of the progress in financial risk protection, especially among the most vulnerable households, are sensitive to survey design. These results are robust to various thresholds of catastrophic health spending. Future work must focus on mitigating survey effects through the development of statistical tools. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:关于具有灾难性健康支出(HCHE)的家庭的可靠和可比较的信息对于监测和评估我们在实现普及财务风险保护方面的进展至关重要。本研究旨在调查测量对调查设计及其社会经济和人口决定簇的金融风险保护进展的敏感性。在2005年和2010/2011年度使用卢旺达综合生活条件调查,我们使用从(1)恢复为期两周的健康模块的口袋健康支出数据来源于盗窃卫生组织的百分比百分比的水平和趋势和六(2005)/七(2010/2011)调查问题(方法1)和(2)消费模块,具有四周/十次/ 12个月的召回期,11(2005)/ 24(2010/2011) )问题(方法2)。采用多级物流回归分析,研究了家庭社会经济和人口特征,影响了估计HCHE调查设计的敏感性。我们发现方法1产生的HCHE估计明显高(9.2%,95%的置信区间8.4%-10.0%)(7.4%,6.6%-8.1%),估计较低(5.6%,5.2%-6.1 %)2010/2011年的方法2(8.2%,7.6%8.7%)。使用这两种方法的HCHE的估计趋势在两年之间并不一致。家庭的规模,其收入五分之一,没有下降的儿童,其头部的教育程度与其使用两种调查方法时的HCHE状态的一致性相关。估计财务风险保护进展,特别是最脆弱的家庭,对调查设计敏感。这些结果对各种灾难性健康支出的阈值稳健。未来的工作必须通过开发统计工具来重点关注减轻调查效果。 (c)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号