首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >A Comparison of Methods for the Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction Between the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
【24h】

A Comparison of Methods for the Diagnosis of Fetal Growth Restriction Between the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

机译:诊所皇家产科医生与妇科医生与美国产科医生学院胎儿生长限制的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) defines fetal growth restriction as ultrasound-estimated fetal weight less than the 10th percentile or abdominal circumference less than the 10th percentile; the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) defines fetal growth restriction as estimated fetal weight less than the 10th percentile alone. We compared each method's ability to predict small for gestational age (SGA) at birth.
机译:目的:皇家产科医生和妇科学院(Rcog)将胎儿生长限制定义为超声估计的胎儿重量小于10百分位或腹周的胎儿重量小于10百分位数; 美国产科医生和妇科学院(ACOG)定义了胎儿生长限制,因为估计胎儿体重小于仅为10百分位数。 我们比较了每种方法在出生时预测胎龄(SGA)的少量少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号