...
【24h】

Voxel-wise grey matter asymmetry analysis in left- and right-handers

机译:左侧和右侧逆向和右手的体素 - 明智的灰质不对称分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Handedness is thought to originate in the brain, but identifying its structural correlates in the cortex has yielded surprisingly incoherent results. One idea proclaimed by several authors is that structural grey matter asymmetries might underlie handedness. While some authors have found significant associations with handedness in different brain areas (e.g. in the central sulcus and precentral sulcus), others have failed to identify such associations. One method used by many researchers to determine structural grey matter asymmetries is voxel based morphometry (VBM). However, it has recently been suggested that the standard VBM protocol might not be ideal to assess structural grey matter asymmetries, as it establishes accurate voxel-wise correspondence across individuals but not across both hemispheres. This could potentially lead to biased and incoherent results. Recently, a new toolbox specifically geared at assessing structural asymmetries and involving accurate voxel-wise correspondence across hemispheres has been published [F. Kurth, C. Gaser, E. Luders. A 12-step user guide for analyzing voxel-wise gray matter asymmetries in statistical parametric mapping (SPM), Nat Protoc 10 (2015), 293-304]. Here, we used this new toolbox to re-assess grey matter asymmetry differences in left-vs. right-handers and linked them to quantitative measures of hand preference and hand skill. While we identified several significant left-right asymmetries in the overall sample, no difference between left-and right-handers reached significance after correction for multiple comparisons. These findings indicate that the structural brain correlates of handedness are unlikely to be rooted in macroscopic grey matter area differences that can be assessed with VBM. Future studies should focus on other potential structural correlates of handedness, e.g. structural white matter asymmetries. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:惯用手被认为在大脑起源,但识别皮质其结构的相关因素,取得了令人惊讶的结果语无伦次。一些作者宣称一种观点认为结构灰质不对称可能背后霸道。尽管有一些学者发现显著的关联在不同脑区利手(例如,在中央沟和中央前沟),其他人都未能确定这样的关联。被许多研究人员能够确定结构灰质不对称的一种方法是基于体素的形态(VBM)。然而,最近有人提出,标准VBM协议可能不理想,以评估结构灰质不对称的,因为它建立跨个人,但不能跨越两个半球准确素明智的对应关系。这可能会导致偏见和不连贯的结果。最近,一个新的工具箱专门在评估结构不对称,涉及跨半球准确素明智的对应齿轮已经公布[F.库尔特,C. Gaser,E.吕德斯。一个12步骤的用户指南中统计参数图(SPM)分析体素明智灰质不对称,纳特Protoc 10(2015),293-304]。在这里,我们使用这个新的工具箱来重新评估左VS灰质不对称的差异。右撇子和链接他们的手偏好和头功的定量措施。虽然我们总体样本中确定了几个显著左右不对称,左,右撇子之间没有差异达到校正多重比较后的意义。这些结果表明,霸道的脑结构相关因素不可能植根于可与VBM评估宏观灰质区域差异。未来的研究应侧重于霸道的其他潜在的结构有关,例如结构性白质不对称。 (c)2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号