...
首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews Cancer >Response Kinetics and Clinical Benefits of Nonintensive AML Therapies in the Absence of Morphologic Response
【24h】

Response Kinetics and Clinical Benefits of Nonintensive AML Therapies in the Absence of Morphologic Response

机译:在没有形态反应的情况下,响应动力学和临床疗效在没有形态反应的情况下

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ultimate goal of treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is to improve survival, and the best means of doing so is through the induction of morphologic remission, which is historically most reliably achieved with intensive chemotherapy regimens. Older patients with AML are less likely to be candidates for or to benefit from intensive chemotherapy. Patients deemed ineligible for intensive therapy may nevertheless benefit from lower-intensity therapies and from newly available targeted AML treatments. Recently approved lower-intensity treatments for AML include enasidenib, ivosidenib, glasdegib, venetoclax, midostaurin, and gilteritinib, and additional promising agents are in later stages of clinical development. Noncytotoxic agents may result in slower kinetics of therapeutic activity compared to intensive regimens, and although they are generally better tolerated than intensive chemotherapy, bone marrow responses are less frequent and may take longer to achieve. Notably, newer therapies might have been considered ineffective had they been judged solely by 2003 International Working Group response criteria for AML, which were based on experience with intensive regimens in predominantly younger patients. Lower-intensity therapies may require several treatment cycles to induce responses, and failure to achieve rapid morphologic remission may not signal the need for treatment cessation or transition to alternative therapies. Additionally, even in the absence of a conventional complete remission, lower-intensity therapies may provide meaningful clinical benefit, including improved survival and quality of life, by inducing hematologic improvement and transfusion independence. Reviewed here are the mechanisms of activity and response kinetics of lower-intensity AML therapies, as well as the clinical benefits resulting from nontraditional AML responses. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
机译:急性髓性白血病(AML)治疗的最终目标是提高生存,最佳方式是通过诱导形态缓解,这在历史上与强化化疗方案最可靠地实现。 AML的老年患者不太可能成为候选人或受益于强化化疗。然而,患者可能因较低强度疗法和新可靶向AML治疗而受益。最近批准的AML的较低强度治疗包括EnAsidenib,Ivosidenib,Glasdegib,威尼斯科克斯,中豚和Gilteritinib,以及额外的有前途的药剂在临床发育的后期。与密集的方案相比,非胞素毒性剂可能导致治疗活性的较慢动力学,虽然它们通常比强烈的化疗更好地耐受,但骨髓反应较小,但可能需要更长时间才能实现。值得注意的是,由于2003年国际工作组响应标准的判断,较新的疗法可能被认为是无效的,因为AML的国际工作组响应标准,这是基于主要患者的密集方案的经验。低强度疗法可能需要几个治疗循环以诱导反应,并且未能实现快速的形态缓解可能不会向替代疗法发出需要治疗或过渡的需要。此外,即使在没有常规完全缓解的情况下,通过诱导血液学改善和输血独立性,较低强度疗法也可以提供有意义的临床益处,包括改善的生存和生活质量。这里审查是较低强度AML疗法的活动和响应动力学的机制,以及由非传统AML反应产生的临床益处。 (c)2019年作者。 elsevier公司出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号