首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Reliability, validity and ability to detect change of the clinician-rated Personal and Social Performance scale in patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia.
【24h】

Reliability, validity and ability to detect change of the clinician-rated Personal and Social Performance scale in patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia.

机译:患有精神分裂症急性症状的患者的信度,效度和检测临床医师评定的个人和社会绩效量表变化的能力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To describe the measurement properties of the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP), a clinician-reported measure of severity of personal and social dysfunction, in subjects with acute symptoms of schizophrenia. METHODS: Pooled data from three paliperidone extended-release clinical studies (n = 1665) and data from a separate noninterventional, cross-sectional, validation study (n = 299) were analyzed. RESULTS: The PSP showed good interrater (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.87) and test-retest (ICCs > 0.90) reliability. Pearson correlation coefficient for association between baseline PSP and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores was -0.32 for subjects assessed by the same rater and -0.29 for subjects assessed by different raters, suggesting low overlap in measurement constructs between the PANSS and PSP. Spearman Rank correlation coefficient for association between baseline PSP and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores was -0.51 with the same rater and -0.15 with different raters. Hypothesized relationships between the PSP and the PANSS or CGI-S based on levels of disease severity were prospectively defined. These hypotheses were confirmed by analyses showing statistically significant differences between baseline mean PSP scores in subjects grouped by severity rating on the CGI-S (mild or less vs. at least moderate) (p < 0.001) and the PANSS ('low symptom severity' vs. 'high symptom severity') (p = 0.005). The PSP was sensitive to change based on statistically significant correlations between change in the PSP and change in the CGI-S (p < 0.001) and the PANSS (p < 0.001). Limitations of analyses include pooling data across studies, interrater reliability assessment in the validation study only, post hoc assessment of test-retest reliability in the paliperidone ER studies, different raters for the PSP and PANSS not specified in the paliperidone ER studies, PSP validity assessment based on the PANSS and the CGI-S as comparators rather than another social function instrument. CONCLUSION: These initial reliability and validity assessments suggest the PSP has promise as a measure of social functioning in patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia.
机译:目的:描述个人和社会绩效量表(PSP)的测量特性,这是临床报告的对患有精神分裂症的急性症状的人的个人和社会功能障碍严重程度的测量。方法:分析了来自三个帕潘立酮缓释临床研究(n = 1665)的汇总数据和来自单独的非介入性横断面验证研究(n = 299)的数据。结果:PSP表现出良好的跨度(类内相关系数[ICC] = 0.87)和重测(ICC> 0.90)的可靠性。基线PSP与阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)总分之间的皮尔逊相关系数,对于由相同评估者评估的受试者,为-0.32,对于由不同评估者评估的受试者,为-0.29,表明PANSS和PSP之间的度量结构重叠低。对于相同的评分者,基线PSP和临床总体印象严重度(CGI-S)评分之间的关​​联的Spearman等级相关系数为-0.51,而不同的评分者为-0.15。前瞻性定义了基于疾病严重程度的PSP与PANSS或CGI-S之间的假设关系。这些假设通过分析得到了证实,这些分析显示了按CGI-S严重等级(轻度或以下vs.至少中度)(p <0.001)和PANSS(“低症状严重度”)进行分组的受试者的基线平均PSP评分之间的统计学显着差异。 vs.“症状严重程度较高”)(p = 0.005)。基于PSP的变化与CGI-S(p <0.001)和PANSS(p <0.001)的变化之间的统计学显着相关性,PSP对变化敏感。分析的局限性包括跨研究汇总数据,仅在验证研究中进行间信度评估,对帕潘立酮ER研究进行事后重测信度事后评估,对帕潘立酮ER研究未指定的PSP和PANSS评估者,PSP有效性评估基于PANSS和CGI-S作为比较器,而不是另一种社会功能工具。结论:这些初步的信度和效度评估表明,PSP有望作为精神分裂症急性症状患者社交功能的一项指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号