首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >A randomized, investigator- masked clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of gatifloxacin 0.3% administered BID versus QID for the treatment BID versus QID for the treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis of acute bacterial conjunctiviti
【24h】

A randomized, investigator- masked clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of gatifloxacin 0.3% administered BID versus QID for the treatment BID versus QID for the treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis of acute bacterial conjunctiviti

机译:研究人员掩盖的一项随机临床试验,比较了0.3%加替沙星与BID联合QID治疗QID与QID联合治疗急性细菌性结膜炎的有效性和安全性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of To compare the efficacy and safety of gatifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.3% (Zymar*) administered BID versus QID in patients with acute bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS: In a randomized, investigator-masked clinical trial, patients diagnosed with bacterial conjunctivitis (based on signs and symptoms) received gatifloxacin either BID or QID for 5days. Visits were scheduled at day 0, day 3, and day 5. Conjunctival cultures were taken at each visit. The clinical cure rate at day 5 was determined for the entire patient population (primary endpoint). Additionally, clinical cure at day 5 was evaluated for a population of patients defined a priori (per protocol) as being culture positive at baseline and with no substantial protocol deviations. Safety was determined through recording of adverse events. Minimal inhibitory concen trations (MIC) and susceptibility of isolates to gatifloxacin were determined using a broth dilution method. RESULTS: Patient characteristics in both the BID and QID groups (N = 104) were similar in terms NN of baseline demographics and disposition. The clinical cure rate on day 5 in the entire, intentto-treat (ITT) population was 86.5% (45/52) in the gatifloxacin BID group and 71.2% (37/52) in the gatifloxacin QID group (95% CI: [-0.03, 30.80]; p = 0.096). In both treatment groups, 5/52 patients (9.6%) reported adverse events. The most common adverse event was conjunctivitis. No serious adverse events were reported. In the a priori-defined per-protocol (PP) population, the clinical cure rate on day 5 was 95.5% (21/22) in the gatifloxacin BID group and 85.7% (18/21) in the gatifloxacin QID group (95% CI: [-7.57, 21.05]; p = 0.294). At baseline, 96.1% (98/102) of the isolates were susceptible to gatifloxacin. The overall MIC(90) (mean +/- standard error of the mean) was 0.5 +/- 1.3 mug/mL. CONCLUSION: In this study, gatifloxacin 0.3% administered BID was as effective and as safe as gatifloxacin 0.3% administered QID for 5 days for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.
机译:目的:比较急性细菌性结膜炎患者的BID和QID加替沙星滴眼液0.3%(Zymar *)的疗效和安全性。方法:在一项由研究者掩盖的随机临床试验中,诊断为细菌性结膜炎(根据体征和症状)的患者接受加替沙星BID或QID治疗5天。探访计划在第0、3、5天进行。确定了整个患者群体(主要终点)在第5天的临床治愈率。另外,对在第5天的临床治愈率进行了评估,该患者群体被定义为先验性的(根据方案),即在基线时培养呈阳性,且方案无明显偏差。通过记录不良事件来确定安全性。使用肉汤稀释法确定了最小抑菌浓度(MIC)和分离株对加替沙星的敏感性。结果:BID和QID组(N = 104)的患者特征在基线人口统计学和处置的NN方面相似。加替沙星BID组在整个意向性治疗(ITT)人群中,第5天的临床治愈率为86.5%(45/52),加替沙星QID组为71.2%(37/52)(95%CI:[ -0.03,30.80]; p = 0.096)。在两个治疗组中,有5/52名患者(9.6%)报告了不良事件。最常见的不良事件是结膜炎。没有严重不良事件的报道。在事先定义的按方案(PP)人群中,加替沙星BID组在第5天的临床治愈率为95.5%(21/22),而加替沙星QID组在临床治愈率为85.7%(18/21)(95% CI:[-7.57,21.05]; p = 0.294)。基线时,有96.1%(98/102)的分离株对加替沙星敏感。总体MIC(90)(平均值的平均值+/-标准误差)为0.5 +/- 1.3杯/毫升。结论:在本研究中,以0.3%加替沙星治疗BID与以0.3%加替沙星治疗QID一样有效且安全,治疗细菌性结膜炎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号