...
首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Prescription patterns of antidepressants: findings from a US claims database.
【24h】

Prescription patterns of antidepressants: findings from a US claims database.

机译:抗抑郁药的处方模式:来自美国索赔数据库的发现。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Introduction of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the 1990s has increased the use of antidepressants and modified their prescription patterns. OBJECTIVE: To identify reasons for prescriptions of antidepressants and factors associated with absence of a labelled indication on the prescription patterns of antidepressants and healthcare costs in a claims database. METHODS: Antidepressant users with a new treatment episode with bupropion, citalopram, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline or venlafaxine in 2003 and 2004 were identified in the PharMetrics database. Any ICD-9 code for an approved or clinically-accepted diagnosis for antidepressant treatments ('diagnosis of interest') occurring within the month before or after the index claim was considered as a reason for prescription. Socio-demographic and medical characteristics were described between users with and without a diagnosis of interest and analysed using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 392 409 antidepressant users were identified. Diagnoses of interest were recorded for 46.7% of users, the most frequent diagnosis being depressive disorders (29% of the patients), anxiety disorders (17%) and abuse and dependence (5%). There were no major differences in patterns of diagnoses of interest between the antidepressants except for fluvoxamine and bupropion. Users without a diagnosis of interest had similar somatic comorbidities and overall baseline costs to users with a diagnosis of interest. However, they used specialised care less often (4.3 vs. 17.8%, OR = 0.50 [0.48; 0.51]), received psychotherapies less frequently (2.7 vs. 26.6%, OR = 0.12 [0.12; 0.12]), and had a shorter duration of use of antidepressants more often (36.9 vs. 28.5%, OR = 1.18 [1.17; 1.20]). CONCLUSIONS: The reason for prescribing antidepressants was often not reported in claims databases, and although antidepressant users with or without a diagnosis of interest can have similar somatic medical profiles and overall costs, they do not follow the same trajectory in the mental healthcare system. Depending on the research question to be answered, it is therefore important to specify which users are being targeted.
机译:背景:1990年代引入5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂增加了抗抑郁药的使用并改变了他们的处方方式。目的:在索赔数据库中确定开具抗抑郁药处方的原因以及与抗抑郁药处方模式上缺少标记说明和医疗费用相关的因素。方法:在2003年和2004年的PharMetrics数据库中,确定了新的发作期使用安非他酮,西酞普兰,度洛西汀,依他普仑,氟西汀,氟伏沙明,帕罗西汀,舍曲林或文拉法辛的抗抑郁药使用者。在索引声明之前或之后一个月内发生的任何用于抗抑郁治疗的批准或临床认可诊断的ICD-9代码(“目标诊断”)均被视为开药原因。在有或没有感兴趣诊断的用户之间描述了社会人口统计学和医学特征,并使用逻辑回归分析。结果:共鉴定出392 409名抗抑郁药使用者。记录到46.7%的用户感兴趣的诊断,最常见的诊断是抑郁症(29%的患者),焦虑症(17%)以及虐待和依赖性(5%)。除氟伏沙明和安非他酮外,抗抑郁药之间在感兴趣的诊断方式上没有重大差异。没有兴趣诊断的用户与有兴趣诊断的用户有相似的躯体合并症和总体基线费用。但是,他们使用专科护理的频率降低了(4.3 vs. 17.8%,OR = 0.50 [0.48; 0.51]),接受心理治疗的频率降低了(2.7 vs. 26.6%,OR = 0.12 [0.12; 0.12]),而且接受治疗的时间更短服用抗抑郁药的持续时间更为频繁(36.9比28.5%,OR = 1.18 [1.17; 1.20])。结论:开具抗抑郁药的原因通常没有在索赔数据库中报告,尽管有或没有感兴趣诊断的抗抑郁药使用者可能具有相似的躯体医学特征和总体费用,但他们在心理保健系统中的轨迹并不相同。因此,根据要回答的研究问题,重要的是要指定目标用户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号