...
首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Adherence and persistence of single-pill ARB/CCB combination therapy compared to multiple-pill ARB/CCB regimens.
【24h】

Adherence and persistence of single-pill ARB/CCB combination therapy compared to multiple-pill ARB/CCB regimens.

机译:与多药ARB / CCB方案相比,单药ARB / CCB联合治疗的坚持和持久性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs)/dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs) single-pill combination (SPC) on adherence to antihypertensive treatment in comparison to free combination of ARBs and CCBs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective data analysis was performed using pharmacy claims data from a national pharmacy benefit management company. The study included patients who were newly initiated on ARB/CCB treatment between 01/01/2007 and 08/31/2008, aged >/= 18 years, and continuously enrolled in the same health plan for 12 months prior to and 13 months after starting ARB/CCB treatment. Outcome variables were persistence, defined as time to discontinuation of therapy, and adherence, defined as proportion of days covered (PDC) >/= 0.80. Propensity score weighting was used to balance the characteristics of the two groups. RESULTS: The final sample contained 2312 patients in the free-combination group and 2213 patients in the SPC group. Patients in the SPC group and the free-combination group were different in age, gender, type of insurance, history of antihypertensive therapy and co-morbidities. These differences were largely normalized after propensity score adjustment. Multivariate logistic model regression showed that patients in the SPC group had a 90% greater odds of being adherent to index therapy compared to patients in the free-combination group (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.75-2.08, p< 0.001). A Cox proportional hazards model showed that patients in the SPC group were less likely to discontinue ARB/CCB SPC therapy compared to patients in the free-combination group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.63-0.70, p < 0.001). In both models, higher copayment (copayment Dollars 50 and above) was associated with worse persistence and adherence in comparison to patients who had a lower copayment (Dollars 0-Dollars 5): HR = 1.23, p < 0.001 and OR = 0.67, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Patients using SPC ARB/CCB therapy were more likely to be persistent and adherent to treatment compared to patients taking free-combination therapy.
机译:目的:评估与单独使用ARB和CCB组合相比,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)/二氢吡啶钙通道抑制剂(CCBs)单药组合(SPC)对坚持降压治疗的影响。研究设计和方法:回顾性数据分析是使用来自国家药房福利管理公司的药房索赔数据进行的。该研究纳入了在2007年1月1日至2008年8月31日之间刚开始接受ARB / CCB治疗的患者,年龄大于等于18岁,并在此之前的12个月内和之后的13个月内连续参加了同一健康计划开始ARB / CCB治疗。结果变量为持续性(定义为停止治疗的时间)和依从性(定义为覆盖天数(PDC)> / = 0.80的比例)。倾向得分加权用于平衡两组的特征。结果:最终样本包括自由组合组的2312例患者和SPC组的2213例患者。 SPC组和自由组合组的患者在年龄,性别,保险类型,降压治疗史和合并症方面有所不同。倾向得分调整后,这些差异在很大程度上得到了标准化。多元逻辑模型回归分析显示,与自由组合组相比,SPC组患者坚持索引治疗的几率高90%(几率[OR] 1.90,95%置信区间[CI] 1.75-2.08) ,p <0.001)。 Cox比例风险模型显示,与自由组合组患者相比,SPC组患者中止ARB / CCB SPC治疗的可能性较小(风险比[HR] 0.66,95%CI 0.63-0.70,p <0.001) 。在这两种模型中,与较低共付额(0美元至5美元)的患者相比,较高的共付额(50美元及以上的共付额)与较差的持久性和依从性相关:HR = 1.23,p <0.001和OR = 0.67,p <0.001。结论:与接受自由组合治疗的患者相比,使用SPC ARB / CCB治疗的患者更有可能坚持和坚持治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号