...
首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >Economic burden and co-morbidities of atrial fibrillation in a privately insured population.
【24h】

Economic burden and co-morbidities of atrial fibrillation in a privately insured population.

机译:私人保险人群中房颤的经济负担和合并症。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the direct (medical and drugs) and indirect (work loss) annual costs associated with Atrial Fibrillation (AFIB) in a privately insured population. BACKGROUND: AFIB is the most common sustained rhythm disturbance, affecting 2.3 million people in the United States. METHODS: Cost and co-morbidity measures for AFIB patients were compared to matched controls using a privately insured administrative database (including medical, drug, and disability claims) for 2 million enrollees, 1999-2002 from 16 employers across the United States. Patients with an AFIB diagnosis on at least two occasions were included in the co-morbidity analysis (n = 3944). A non-AFIB control sample was randomly selected with a 1:1 ratio, with characteristics (i.e., age, gender, health plan) matched to AFIB patients. Excess medical costs (i.e., employer payments) were estimated for AFIB patients, defined as the difference in average annual costs between AFIB and control patients (n = 3944); excess work-losscosts were defined similarly for employees with available work-loss data (n = 603). Statistical significance in the descriptive analysis was measured by paired t-tests for cost, or Chi-square tests for co-morbidity comparisons. A two-part multivariate model of excess cost was further estimated to control for co-existing conditions and other patient characteristics. The excess costs of AFIB patients were estimated as the difference between the observed costs of AFIB patients and their estimated costs, assuming they did not have AFIB. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis found that the excess annual direct cost of AFIB was Dollars 12,349 (p < 0.01), with AFIB patients approximately 5 times as costly as non-AFIB individuals (Dollars 15,553 versus Dollars 3204, respectively). The excess annual total cost was Dollars 14,875 (p < 0.01), with AFIB patients again approximately 5 times as costly as non-AFIB individuals (Dollars 18,454 versus Dollars 3,579, respectively). AFIB was associated with increased incidence of atrial flutter (p < 0.01), heart failure (Relative Risk (RR) = 29, p < 0.01), other arrhythmias/conduction disorders (RR = 16, p < 0.01), heart attack (RR = 8, p < 0.01), and stroke (RR = 6, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: AFIB is a costly disease and one for which more definitive therapies might offer some potential for reducing, not only the clinical impact, but also the economic burden of the disease.
机译:目的:本研究评估了私人保险人群中与房颤相关的直接(医疗和药物)和间接(工作损失)年度成本。背景:AFIB是最常见的持续性节律障碍,在美国影响230万人。方法:使用私人保险的行政数据库(包括医疗,药物和伤残索赔),将AFIB患者的费用和合并症指标与匹配的对照进行比较,该数据库涵盖了1999-2002年来自美国16个雇主的200万参与者。至少有两次AFIB诊断的患者包括在合并症分析中(n = 3944)。非AFIB对照样品以1:1的比例随机选择,其特征(即年龄,性别,健康计划)与AFIB患者相匹配。估计AFIB患者的医疗费用过高(即,雇主付款),定义为AFIB与对照患者之间的平均年度费用之差(n = 3944);对于具有可用工作损失数据(n = 603)的员工,类似地定义了超额工作损失成本。描述性分析中的统计显着性是通过成对的t检验(成本)或卡方检验(共发病率比较)来衡量的。进一步估计了由两部分组成的超额费用多元模型,以控制共存病情和其他患者特征。 AFIB患者的超额费用估计为观察到的AFIB患者费用与其估计费用之间的差额(假设他们没有AFIB)。结果:多变量分析发现,AFIB每年的额外直接费用为12,349美元(p <0.01),AFIB患者的费用约为非AFIB个人的5倍(分别为15,553美元和3204美元)。每年额外的总费用为14,875美元(p <0.01),AFIB患者的费用又是非AFIB患者的5倍(分别为18,454美元和3,579美元)。 AFIB与房扑发生率增加(p <0.01),心力衰竭(相对风险(RR)= 29,p <0.01),其他心律不齐/传导异常(RR = 16,p <0.01),心脏病发作(RR = 8,p <0.01)和冲程(RR = 6,p <0.01)。结论:AFIB是一种代价高昂的疾病,对它而言,更明确的疗法可能为减轻疾病的临床影响以及经济负担提供一定的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号