首页> 外文期刊>Medical Physics >SU‐F‐J‐64: Comparison of Dosimetric Robustness Between Proton Therapy and IMRT Plans Following Tumor Regression for Locally Advanced Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
【24h】

SU‐F‐J‐64: Comparison of Dosimetric Robustness Between Proton Therapy and IMRT Plans Following Tumor Regression for Locally Advanced Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

机译:SU-F-J-64:质子疗法与IMRT计划之间的剂量稳健性在局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)后的肿瘤疗法和IMRT计划之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: In the light of tumor regression and normal tissue changes, dose distributions can deviate undesirably from what was planned. As a consequence, replanning is sometimes necessary during treatment to ensure continued tumor coverage or to avoid overdosing organs at risk (OARs). Proton plans are generally thought to be less robust than photon plans because of the proton beam's higher sensitivity to changes in tissue composition, suggesting also a higher likely replanning rate due to tumor regression. The purpose of this study is to compare dosimetric deviations between forward‐calculated double scattering (DS) proton plans with IMRT plans upon tumor regression, and assesses their impact on clinical replanning decisions. Methods: Ten consecutive locally advanced NSCLC patients whose tumors shrank 50% in volume and who received four or more CT scans during radiotherapy were analyzed. All the patients received proton radiotherapy (6660 cGy, 180 cGy/fx). Dosimetric robustness during therapy was characterized by changes in the planning objective metrics as well as by point‐by‐point root‐mean‐squared differences for the entire PTV, ITV, and OARs (heart, cord, esophagus, brachial plexus and lungs) DVHs. Results: Sixty‐four pairs of DVHs were reviewed by three clinicians, who requested a replanning rate of 16.7% and 18.6% for DS and IMRT plans, respectively, with a high agreement between providers. Robustness of clinical indicators was found to depend on the beam orientation and dose level on the DVH curve. Proton dose increased most in OARs distal to the PTV along the beam path, but these changes were primarily in the mid to low dose levels. In contrast, the variation in IMRT plans occurred primarily in the high dose region. Conclusion: Robustness of clinical indicators depends where on the DVH curves comparisons are made. Similar replanning rates were observed for DS and IMRT plans upon large tumor regression.
机译:目的:在肿瘤消退和正常组织的变化的光,剂量分布可从过去被不期望地计划偏离。因此,重新规划是在治疗过程中有时需要确保持续的肿瘤的覆盖,或者避免过量机关风险(桨)。质子计划通常被认为是比因为质子束对在组织成分由于肿瘤消退的变化,也暗示了更高可能重新规划率更高的灵敏度的光子计划较不健壮。这项研究的目的是比较正向计算的双散射(DS)之间的剂量学偏差质子计划与在肿瘤消退IMRT计划,并评估其对临床重新规划决策的影响。方法:10个连续的局部晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的肿瘤缩小>在50体积%和谁收到放疗期间四个或更多个CT扫描进行分析。接收质子放疗所有患者(6660 cGy的,180 cGy的/ FX)。治疗期间的剂量测定鲁棒性的特点是在规划客观度量的变化以及通过为整个PTV DVHS逐点根均平方差,ITV,和桨(心脏,脊髓,食道,臂丛神经和肺) 。结果:64对DVHS的是由三个医生,谁要求的16.7%,而DS和IMRT计划,分别为18.6%,一重新规划速度,与供应商之间具有高度一致性审核。的临床指标的鲁棒性被发现依赖于光束方向和剂量水平的DVH曲线上。质子剂量的增加最危及器官远端沿着光束路径的PTV,但这些变化在中到低剂量水平为主。相反,在IMRT计划的变化主要发生在高剂量区。结论:临床指标稳健性取决于其中的DVH曲线比较制成。观察到类似的重新规划率,用于在大肿瘤消退DS和IMRT计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号