...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Physics >SU‐F‐J‐115: Target Volume and Artifact Evaluation of a New Device‐Less 4D CT Algorithm
【24h】

SU‐F‐J‐115: Target Volume and Artifact Evaluation of a New Device‐Less 4D CT Algorithm

机译:SU-F-J-115:一种新的设备较少的4D CT算法的目标音量和工件评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: 4DCT is often used in radiation therapy treatment planning to define the extent of motion of the visible tumor (IGTV). Recent available software allows 4DCT images to be created without the use of an external motion surrogate. This study aims to compare this device‐less algorithm to a standard device‐driven technique (RPM) in regards to artifacts and the creation of treatment volumes. Methods: 34 lung cancer patients who had previously received a cine 4DCT scan on a GE scanner with an RPM determined respiratory signal were selected. Cine images were sorted into 10 phases based on both the RPM signal and the device‐less algorithm. Contours were created on standard and device‐less maximum intensity projection (MIP) images using a region growing algorithm and manual adjustment to remove other structures. Variations in measurements due to intra‐observer differences in contouring were assessed by repeating a subset of 6 patients 2 additional times. Artifacts in each phase image were assessed using normalized cross correlation at each bed position transition. A score between +1 (artifacts “better” in all phases for device‐less) and ?1 (RPM similarly better) was assigned for each patient based on these results. Results: Device‐less IGTV contours were 2.1 ± 1.0% smaller than standard IGTV contours (not significant, p = 0.15). The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was 0.950 ± 0.006 indicating good similarity between the contours. Intra‐observer variation resulted in standard deviations of 1.2 percentage points in percent volume difference and 0.005 in DSC measurements. Only two patients had improved artifacts with RPM, and the average artifact score (0.40) was significantly greater than zero. Conclusion: Device‐less 4DCT can be used in place of the standard method for target definition due to no observed difference between standard and device‐less IGTVs. Phase image artifacts were significantly reduced with the device‐less method.
机译:目的:4DCT通常用于放射治疗治疗计划,以定义可见肿瘤的运动程度(IGTV)。最近的可用软件允许创建4DCT图像,而无需使用外部运动代理。本研究旨在将该设备较少的算法与标准设备驱动技术(RPM)进行比较,以便伪像和创建治疗体积。方法:选择34例以预先接收到具有RPM确定的呼吸信号的GE扫描仪上的Cine 4DCT扫描的肺癌患者。基于RPM信号和较少的设备算法,将CINE图像分为10个阶段。使用区域越来越多的算法和手动调节,在标准和设备上的最大强度投影(MIP)图像上创建轮廓,以便移除其他结构。通过重复6例患者2次额外的时间来评估由于观察者内部差异的测量结果的变化。使用每个床位置转换的标准化交叉相关评估每个相位图像中的伪影。基于这些结果,为每个患者分配了+1的+1(少数阶段)的分数(在所有阶段)和Δ1(类似地更好)为每个患者为每个患者分配的。结果:较少的IGTV轮廓比标准IGTV轮廓小2.1±1.0%(不显着,P = 0.15)。骰子相似度系数(DSC)为0.950±0.006,表明轮廓之间的良好相似性。观察者内变化导致标准偏差为1.2个百分点,体积差异差异差异,0.005在DSC测量中。只有两名患者改进了具有RPM的伪影,平均伪像评分(0.40)明显大于零。结论:由于在不观察到的标准和较少的IGTV之间没有观察到的差异,可以使用较少的4dct代替目标定义的标准方法。使用较少的装置的方法显着降低相位图像伪影。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号