...
首页> 外文期刊>Forest Ecology and Management >Soil disturbance and stream-adjacent disturbance from tethered logging in Oregon and Washington
【24h】

Soil disturbance and stream-adjacent disturbance from tethered logging in Oregon and Washington

机译:俄勒冈州和华盛顿束缚测井的土壤干扰和溪流邻近干扰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the past century, the primary method for harvesting trees on steep slopes in the Pacific Northwest (PNW) was felling with chainsaws and yarding with cable systems, such as towers. Concerns over safety and higher logging costs on steep slopes have caused a shift in felling and/or yarding to ground-based machines tethered to an anchor, generally at the top of the slope. With the recent shift to tethered operations, there has been growing interest in the potential impact of machinery on steep slopes on streams and site productivity. We compared soil disturbance and stream-adjacent disturbance of tethered logging and conventional cable harvest methods on steep slopes in Oregon and Washington, USA. We sampled 30 harvest units that included either conventional (n = 15) or combination units with tethered (n = 15) harvesting systems to examine soil disturbance within a harvest unit and along stream channels. We compared potential impacts to stream adjacent-disturbance, erosion, and site productivity both between harvesting types within a harvest unit and between conventional versus combination units with tethered operations. We found that combination units with tethered operations had more stream-adjacent disturbance and soil disturbance than conventional cable-harvesting systems, but overall effects were below applicable regulatory thresholds for stream-adjacent disturbance and soil disturbance. Further, at the entire harvest-unit and within-unit scale, tethered operations had similar amounts of soil disturbance as mechanized harvesting systems. We did not find evidence of strong relationships between stream-adjacent disturbance or soil disturbance with either slope or soil depth. Across a wide variation of local site conditions in the PNW, tethered harvesting operations did not have extensive negative impacts on either soil disturbance or stream-adjacent disturbance, but further research could contribute to evolving best management practices and aligning forest practice regulations with current technologies.
机译:在过去的一世纪中,在太平洋西北(PNW)的陡坡上收获树木的主要方法是用电锯和电缆系统,如塔楼砍伐。对陡坡上的安全性和更高的测井成本的担忧导致砍伐和/或码的转变为锚固到锚的地基机器,通常在斜坡的顶部。随着近期转向束缚行动,对机械对陡坡岩石和现场生产力的潜在影响越来越感兴趣。我们对美国俄勒冈州和华盛顿州陡坡陡坡和常规电缆收获方法的土壤扰动和流遥控障碍。我们采样了30个收获单元,其包括常规(n = 15)或组合单元,其中具有系绳(n = 15)收获系统,以检查收获单元内的土壤干扰和沿着流通道。我们将潜在的影响与在收获单元内的收获类型和具有系绳操作之间的传统与组合单元之间的收获类型之间进行潜在的影响,以在收获类型之间进行互相扰动,侵蚀和站点生产率。我们发现,具有束缚作业的组合单元具有比传统的电缆收集系统更多的流相邻的扰动和土壤干扰,但总体效应低于流邻近干扰和土壤干扰的适用调节阈值。此外,在整个收获单元和单位间规模中,系束性操作具有类似的土壤扰动量作为机械化收集系统。我们没有发现具有斜坡或土壤深度的溪流邻近干扰或土壤干扰之间的强有力的证据。在PNW中的局部局部条件的广泛变化中,系束性收获操作对土壤干扰或流相邻的干扰没有广泛的负面影响,但进一步的研究可能有助于不断发展的最佳管理实践,并与当前技术对齐森林实践法规。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号