首页> 外文期刊>Forest Ecology and Management >Ground-dwelling spiders and understory vascular plants on Fuegian austral forests: Community responses to variable retention management and their association to natural ecosystems
【24h】

Ground-dwelling spiders and understory vascular plants on Fuegian austral forests: Community responses to variable retention management and their association to natural ecosystems

机译:Fuegian澳门林的地面居住蜘蛛和林血管植物:对可变保留管理及其与自然生态系统的协会的社区响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Variable retention mitigates negative effects of traditional harvesting on biodiversity, maintaining legacies in harvested forests as habitat for sensitive species, and generating other habitats for early-seral species. Their assessment, including drivers, has a high concern for society. Likewise, species association with ecosystems in the landscape (as different forest types, grasslands and peatlands) are unknown for some taxa and regions, and could explain species flow into harvested areas. Therefore, we evaluated the forest harvest impact on ground-dwelling spiders and vascular plants, their diversity and association to vegetation types in the landscape matrix, and richness and abundance correlations with forest structure. Six natural common habitats were studied in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina), where variable retention has been implemented: aggregated (AR) and dispersed (DR) retention in harvested Nothofagus pumilio forests, unharvested primary forests (NPF) as reference, grasslands (G), peatlands (P), and unharvested N. antarctica forests (NAF). We surveyed spiders (N = 432, by 6 habitats x 6 replicates x 6 collections x 2 years), and vascular plants (N = 36, by 6 habitats x 6 replicates), and characterized forest structure in wooded ecosystems. We determined for both taxa richness, relative abundance (total captures/ground cover) and Shannon-Wiener and Pielou indices, compared assemblage composition and indicator species among harvesting treatments and vegetation types, and analyzed correlations. We sampled 752 individuals of spiders from 33 species (six families), and 79 vascular plant species (28 families) that averaged 52% total vegetation cover. Total spider captures and overall richness were higher in DR > NPF > AR, although differences were not detected at plot level for any variable. For understory vascular plants, richness and cover were the highest on DR, followed by AR and NPF, as well as at plot level, with no affectation in indices. Likewise, highest richness and abundance occurred in NAF and NPF for spiders, and in NAF and G for vascular plants, with unique assemblages in each vegetation type despite the shared species. Assemblages also differed in harvested areas, including species of other vegetation types mainly in DR, where new conditions were generated by reduction of forest structure variables (evidenced by negative correlations), while AR maintained species composition similar to NPF, contributing to the conservation of forest specialists. Indicators occurred for both taxa in several habitats. This study highlights the importance of different vegetation types for spider and plant conservation at landscape level, while provides tools for developing monitoring strategies and conservation policies.
机译:可变保留减轻了传统采伐对生物多样性的负面影响,将收获森林中的遗产视为敏感物种的栖息地,并为早期锯齿等产生其他栖息地。他们的评估包括司机,对社会有很高的关注。同样地,某些分类群和地区的景观中与生态系统(如不同的森林类型,草地和泥炭地)的物种联系,并且可以解释物种流入收获的地区。因此,我们评估了对地面夹住蜘蛛和血管植物的森林收获影响,它们在景观矩阵中的植被类型以及与森林结构的丰富度和丰富相关性。研究了六次自然常见的栖息地(阿根廷),已经实施了可变保留:汇总(AR)和分散(DR)保留在收获的Nothofagus Pumilio森林中,未收纳的原发性森林(NPF)作为参考,草原(G) ,泥炭地(p)和未收纳的N.南极洲森林(NAF)。我们受到调查的蜘蛛(N = 432,6栖息地X 6复制X 6 Collections X 2年),血管植物(n = 36,达到6人栖息地x 6重复),并在树木生态系统中表征森林结构。我们厘定分类群体,相对丰富(总捕获/地面)和香农 - 维纳和Pielou指数,比较收集治疗和植被类型的组合组成和指示物种,并分析相关性。我们从33种(六个家庭)和79种血管植物种类(28个家庭)中取样了752个蜘蛛,平均植被覆盖率为52%。 DR> NPF> AR中的总蜘蛛捕获和总体丰富度较高,尽管在任何变量的绘图水平下未检测到差异。对于林血管植物,丰富性和覆盖物是博士最高的,其次是AR和NPF,以及情节等级,没有索引的影响。同样,在NAF和NPF中发生最高的丰富性和丰富,蜘蛛,NAF和G用于血管植物,尽管存在共用物种,但每种植被类型的独特组装。收集区域也不同,包括主要在DR中的其他植被类型,其中通过减少森林结构变量产生新的条件(通过负相关证明),而AR维持类似于NPF的物种组成,有助于森林保护专家。两种栖息地的分类群体发生指标。本研究突出了不同植被类型在横向水平的蜘蛛和植物保护的重要性,同时为发展监测策略和保护政策提供工具。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Forest Ecology and Management》 |2020年第1期|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Nacl Cordoba UNCor Inst Multidisciplinario Biol Vegetal IMBIV Ctr Relevamiento Evaluac Recursos Agr &

    Nat CREAN Consejo Nacl Invest Cient &

    Tecn CONICET Av Valparaiso S-N Cc 509 RA-5000 Cordoba Argentina;

    Consejo Nacl Invest Cient &

    Tecn CONICET Ctr Austral Invest Cient CADIC Lab Recursos Agroforestales Houssay 200 RA-9410 Ushuaia Tierra Del Fueg Argentina;

    Consejo Nacl Invest Cient &

    Tecn CONICET MACN Av Angel Gallardo 470 C1405DJR Buenos Aires DF Argentina;

    Consejo Nacl Invest Cient &

    Tecn CONICET MACN Av Angel Gallardo 470 C1405DJR Buenos Aires DF Argentina;

    Consejo Nacl Invest Cient &

    Tecn CONICET Ctr Austral Invest Cient CADIC Lab Recursos Agroforestales Houssay 200 RA-9410 Ushuaia Tierra Del Fueg Argentina;

    Consejo Nacl Invest Cient &

    Tecn CONICET Ctr Austral Invest Cient CADIC Lab Recursos Agroforestales Houssay 200 RA-9410 Ushuaia Tierra Del Fueg Argentina;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 林业;
  • 关键词

    Araneae; Biodiversity conservation; Nothofagus; Tierra del Fuego; Aggregated retention; Dispersed retention; Bioindicators;

    机译:Araneae;生物多样性保护;Nothofagus;Tierra del Fuego;汇总保留;分散保留;生物indicer;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号